Options
Rhetoric and Argument in Social and Environmental Reporting: the Dirty Laundry case
Author(s)
Date Issued
2014
Date Available
2014-08-06T10:33:58Z
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the interactive element in social and environmental reporting during a controversy between business organisations and a stakeholder over environmental performance. Design/methodology/approach: The paper adopts Aristotle's triangular framework of the rhetorical situation to examine how the writer, the audience, and the purpose of communication interact in the choice of rhetorical strategies used to persuade others of the validity and legitimacy of a claim during a public controversy. The analysis focuses on the strategies (i.e. moves and their rhetorical realisations) in the form of logos (appealing to logic), ethos (appealing to authority), and pathos (appealing to emotion), with a particular emphasis on metaphor, used to achieve social and political goals. The authors base the analysis on a case study involving a conflict between Greenpeace and six organisations in the sportswear/fashion industry over wastewater discharge of hazardous chemicals. The conflict played out in a series of 20 press releases issued by the parties over a two-month period. Findings: All six firms interacting with Greenpeace in the form of press releases eventually conceded to Greenpeace's demand to eliminate hazardous chemicals from their supply chains. The paper attributes this to Greenpeace's ability to harness support from other key stakeholders and to use rhetoric effectively. Results show the extensive use of rhetoric by all parties. Originality/value: The authors regard legitimacy construction as reliant on communication and as being achieved by organisations participating in a dialogue with stakeholders. For this purpose, the paper develops an analytical framework which situates environmental reporting in a specific rhetorical situation and links rhetoric, argument, and metaphor.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Emerald
Journal
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume
27
Issue
4
Start Page
602
End Page
633
Copyright (Published Version)
2014 Emerald
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Name
04_31_Brennan_Merkl-Davies_Rhetoric_and_Argument_in_Social_and_Environmental_Reporting.pdf
Size
319.61 KB
Format
Owning collection
Scopus© citations
101
Acquisition Date
Apr 17, 2024
Apr 17, 2024
Views
1805
Last Month
1
1
Acquisition Date
Apr 17, 2024
Apr 17, 2024
Downloads
1724
Last Week
1
1
Last Month
7
7
Acquisition Date
Apr 17, 2024
Apr 17, 2024