Options
The Rights of Others: Asylum Seekers and Direct Provision in Ireland
Author(s)
Date Issued
2014-12-10
Date Available
2015-01-15T16:38:34Z
Abstract
The system of direct provision for asylum seekers is 14 years old. Direct provision is
where asylum seekers are provided with bed and board, along with a weekly allowance of €19.10 per week per adult or €9.60 per week per child. Asylum seekers are not entitled to any other social welfare payments and cannot seek or enter employment, on pain of criminal sanction. Direct provision, introduced in April 2000, came at a time of considerable moral panic about 'welfare abuse' by asylum seekers in Ireland. For over 14 years, this system has existed on an extra-legislative basis and without any in-depth examination, from the Legislature, the Executive or the Judiciary on the impact of direct provision on the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of asylum seekers. Hanna Arendt, in The Origins of Totalitarianism noted that the world sees noting sacred in 'the abstract nakedness of being human'. Using Arendt’s views as a starting point, this paper explores Ireland’s legal
obligations towards those seeking protection in Ireland. Examining our international, European and domestic obligations, the paper will seek to explore whether the system of direct provision complies with fundamental human rights law and norms. With a judicial review of the totality of the direct provision system currently before the High Court, this paper provides an analysis of how 'the right to have rights' for asylum seekers is limited.
where asylum seekers are provided with bed and board, along with a weekly allowance of €19.10 per week per adult or €9.60 per week per child. Asylum seekers are not entitled to any other social welfare payments and cannot seek or enter employment, on pain of criminal sanction. Direct provision, introduced in April 2000, came at a time of considerable moral panic about 'welfare abuse' by asylum seekers in Ireland. For over 14 years, this system has existed on an extra-legislative basis and without any in-depth examination, from the Legislature, the Executive or the Judiciary on the impact of direct provision on the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights of asylum seekers. Hanna Arendt, in The Origins of Totalitarianism noted that the world sees noting sacred in 'the abstract nakedness of being human'. Using Arendt’s views as a starting point, this paper explores Ireland’s legal
obligations towards those seeking protection in Ireland. Examining our international, European and domestic obligations, the paper will seek to explore whether the system of direct provision complies with fundamental human rights law and norms. With a judicial review of the totality of the direct provision system currently before the High Court, this paper provides an analysis of how 'the right to have rights' for asylum seekers is limited.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Community Law and Mediation
Journal
Irish Community Development Law Journal
Volume
3
Issue
2
Start Page
22
End Page
42
Web versions
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ba6f/6ba6f3514a187984a29396b47bb62d2f946b4bd2" alt="Thumbnail Image"
Loading...
Name
FINAL_The_Rights_of_Others_AS_in_Direct_Provision.pdf
Size
421.99 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
ade2e140903e30beb35252cf47cd911b
Owning collection