From Welfare State to Regulatory State: Meta-Regulation and Beyond

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Scott, Colin
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-15T08:24:16Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-15T08:24:16Z
dc.date.issued 2014-12-25
dc.identifier.citation University of Tokyo Journal of Law and Politics en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10197/7022
dc.description.abstract The literature on the rise of the regulatory state in Europe has tended to suggest that the regulatory state, as a mode of governance, has substantially disp laced the instruments and institutions which together comprised the welfare state as the dominant mode of governing in the twentieth century. Majone has suggested that the regulatory state mode involves not only distinctive instruments and institutions, no tably rules and regulatory agencies, but also a distinctive ethos which tends to prioritise the correction of market failure over state functions linked to redistribution and macro-economic stabilization. Similar trends in Australia, it is claimed, led to welfare rights groups recasting their claims on public policy actors in terms of market rather than redistributive terms. However, though instruments and institutions may have seen significant changes, it is clear that political objectives concerning welfa re remain a significant component of government activity in most European states and further afield. I suggest in this article that there is evidence to support the argument that regulatory governance modes have supported and enhanced aspects of welfare pr ovision, for example making aspects of provision more transparent, promoting capacity for seeking redress, and more generally clarifying accountability relationships and responsibilities. A next step is to note a degree of disenchantment with the regulator y state, as classically conceived, because of weaknesses in command and control methods, and concerns over counter-productive and unintended effects. With regulatory thinking solutions to these problems lie in alternative modes of governance drawing on net works and capacities for steering of self-regulation. I suggest that such techniques have much to offer contemporary welfare programmes. en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Graduate Schools for Law and Politics, the University of Tokyo en
dc.subject Regulation en
dc.subject Governance en
dc.subject Welfare state en
dc.title From Welfare State to Regulatory State: Meta-Regulation and Beyond en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.internal.webversions http://www.ibc.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/publications/journal.html
dc.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.volume 11 en
dc.identifier.startpage 159 en
dc.identifier.endpage 173 en
dc.neeo.contributor Scott|Colin|aut|
dc.internal.notes Welfare2RegMetaregAndBeyond.pdf en
dc.description.admin Deposited by bulk import en
dc.internal.rmsid 400420026 en
dc.date.updated 2015-07-31T17:04:54.322+01:00 en


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.

If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.

Search Research Repository


Advanced Search

Browse