Options
Nondetection, false alarm, and calibration insensitivity in kurtosis- and pseudofractal-based singularity detection
File(s)
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
asce aerospace corrected 31.08.08.pdf | 681.04 KB |
Author(s)
Date Issued
15 September 2009
Date Available
16T10:27:44Z May 2019
Abstract
This work isolates cases of nondetection, false alarm, and insensitivity for a general class of problems dealing with the detection and characterization of existence, location, and extent of singularities embedded in signals or in their derivatives when employing kurtosis- and pseudofractal-based methods for the detection and characterization process. The nondetection, false alarm, and insensitivity for these methods are illustrated on an example problem of damage identification and calibration in beams where the singularity to be identified lies in the derivative of the measured signal. The findings are general, not constrained to linear systems, and are potentially applicable to a wide range of fields including engineering system identification, fault detection, health monitoring of mechanical and civil structures, sensor failure, aerospace engineering, and biomedical engineering.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
ASCE Library
Journal
Journal of Aerospace Engineering
Volume
22
Issue
4
Start Page
466
End Page
470
Copyright (Published Version)
2009 ASCE
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0893-1321
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
Owning collection
Scopus© citations
7
Acquisition Date
Feb 5, 2023
Feb 5, 2023
Views
653
Last Month
1
1
Acquisition Date
Feb 5, 2023
Feb 5, 2023
Downloads
227
Acquisition Date
Feb 5, 2023
Feb 5, 2023