Educational developmentalists divided? Patrick Cannon, Patrick Hillery and the economics of education in the early 1960's

The role of Patrick Cannon as a developmentalist critic of the educational status quo at the beginning of the 1960s is highlighted by Tom Garvin in Preventing the
Future. Here the organisation the Headmaster of Sandymount High School led, the
Federation of Lay Catholic Secondary Schools, is depicted as coming in from the
bureaucratic cold as Jack Lynch brought a more activist, reformist ministerial presence
into the Department of Education. But although the reforming trend continued
under Lynch's successor, Patrick Hillery, Cannon and his organisation quickly
found themselves operating in a very hostile environment. In 1962 the Department
broke off relations with the Federation over its decision to adopt a new title while
Hillery publicly accused it of blackening Ireland's name overseas in a report that
applied the same economics of education approach that the Department itself was
embracing in collaboration with the OECD.
The catalytic effect of the OECD-linked study that produced Investment in Education
is a much-celebrated episode of Ireland's modernisation. A remarkably broad
cross-departmental consensus supported the initiative. Bureaucratic caution and
ministerial self-preservation were set aside to allow a 'warts and all' portrait of Irish
education to be painted by the study team. Special efforts were made to focus public
attention on the findings of a damning report that legitimated a quickening pace
of government action to increase access to an expanded, rationalised and reoriented
education system. But, as well as developmentalist triumph over conservatism
in the education field, there was also significant division between state and civil
society developmentalists which a case study of the relationship between the secondary schools' federation led by Cannon and the Department of Education enables us to explore.