Options
Adopting Roles: Generosity and Presumptuousness
Author(s)
Date Issued
2015-10
Date Available
2015-09-03T16:20:46Z
Abstract
An understanding of generosity must be central to an understanding of our moral nature, yet there is no good philosophical account of generosity. This is exemplified in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, where interesting accounts of liberality (using your wealth well) and magnificence (spending large amounts of money well) are provided in Book IV, but none of generosity. Hutcheson and Hume were interested in benevolence, but benevolence is not the same thing as generosity either. For Hume, benevolence is ‘desire of the happiness of the person belov’d, and an aversion to his misery.’ (Treatise, 2.2.9.3) So, acting benevolently, for Hume, is acting from this sentiment for the sake of someone else’s wellbeing. Picking up litter that somebody else has dropped is not benevolent on this account, but I think it may count as generous behaviour. And conversely, I will argue later that benevolent actions that are presumptuous and intrusive are not generous.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Journal
Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements
Volume
77
Start Page
141
End Page
161
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
Generosity_and_Presumptuousness_edited.docx
Size
55.65 KB
Format
Microsoft Word
Checksum (MD5)
ee580de8969f520e5a4a47e449aab3ae
Owning collection