Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
University College Dublin
  • Colleges & Schools
  • Statistics
  • All of DSpace
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Social Sciences and Law
  3. School of Psychology
  4. Psychology Research Collection
  5. Differential outcomes to a pain management programme based on coping style
 
  • Details
Options

Differential outcomes to a pain management programme based on coping style

File(s)
FileDescriptionSizeFormat
Download Pain_2010x.pdf274.17 KB
Alternative Title
Evaluation of differential responses of subgroups of chronic pain patients to a pain management programme
Author(s)
McMorrow, Eva 
Walsh, Rosemary 
O'Keeffe, Declan 
Dooley, Barbara A. 
Guerin, Suzanne 
Carr, Alan 
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10197/5183
Date Issued
2010
Date Available
13T10:24:30Z December 2013
Abstract
The study objectives were to investigate whether a heterogeneous sample of Irish chronic pain patients could be classified into subgroups using the Multidimensional Pain Inventory to profile the subgroups’ experiences of pain and distress, and to compare their responses to a multidisciplinary pain management programme. Ninety chronic pain patients completed the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) before and after a multidisciplinary pain management programme and at 6–23 months follow-up. Eighty-eight percent of patients were classified as Dysfunctional (DYS), Interpersonally Distressed (ID), or Adaptive Coper (AC) on the basis of their responses to the MPI. The proportions of patients classified into the three MPI groups were similar to those found in previous studies: 21% were AC, 20% were ID, and 47% were DYS. The three groups differed significantly in their levels of pre-treatment pain and distress. Compared with the AC group, the DYS group had greater pain and both the DYS and ID groups had greater distress. For measures of pain intensity and interference, from pre- to post-treatment, the DYS group improved significantly more than the AC group, but for pain intensity, the DYS group had relapsed at follow-up and the AC group’s interference scores had significantly improved. All patients who participated in the programme showed significant improvement in depression and the sense of control they had over their lives; this improvement was partially maintained at follow-up; and participants expressed a high level of satisfaction with all aspects of the programme. In conclusion, Irish chronic pain patients are not a homogeneous group and may be classified into subgroups based on psychological factors. Treatment response may be related to subgroup membership. Future research should evaluate whether tailoring treatments to patient characteristics will improve treatment outcome.
Sponsorship
Other funder
Other Sponsorship
clinical psychology grant from the HSE Midland area.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Routledge (Taylor & Francis)
Journal
The Irish Journal of Psychology
Volume
31
Issue
1-2
Start Page
11
End Page
26
Copyright (Published Version)
2010 The Psychological Society of Ireland
Keywords
  • Pain management progr...

  • MPI

  • MPQ

DOI
10.1080/03033910.2010.10446319
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
Owning collection
Psychology Research Collection
Scopus© citations
1
Acquisition Date
Jan 30, 2023
View Details
Views
1648
Last Week
1
Last Month
1
Acquisition Date
Jan 31, 2023
View Details
Downloads
381
Last Month
113
Acquisition Date
Jan 31, 2023
View Details
google-scholar
University College Dublin Research Repository UCD
The Library, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4
Phone: +353 (0)1 716 7583
Fax: +353 (0)1 283 7667
Email: mailto:research.repository@ucd.ie
Guide: http://libguides.ucd.ie/rru

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement