Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
University College Dublin
  • Colleges & Schools
  • Statistics
  • All of DSpace
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Engineering & Architecture
  3. School of Civil Engineering
  4. Civil Engineering Research Collection
  5. Performance of concrete incorporating GGBS in aggressive wastewater environments
 
  • Details
Options

Performance of concrete incorporating GGBS in aggressive wastewater environments

File(s)
FileDescriptionSizeFormat
Download O'Connell et al - CBM2012.pdf612.14 KB
Author(s)
O'Connell, M. 
McNally, Ciaran 
Richardson, Mark G. 
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10197/4146
Date Issued
February 2012
Date Available
26T15:26:23Z February 2013
Abstract
Concrete is traditionally used as the main component of wastewater facilities. The sulfate and acidic environment presents significant challenges. Supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) such as GGBS are being used in increasing quantities in concrete and have been shown to provide concrete with increased durability in this particular environment. They have traditionally been used with CEM I, but in recent years a shift in concrete practice has led to the introduction of CEM II cements with reduced CO2 footprint and obvious environmental and economic benefits. However, the change in cement chemistry associated with using CEM II and GGBS must also be accounted for in concrete specifications for aggressive environments. This has particular importance when concrete is exposed to elevated sulfate and sulfuric acid environments, such as that associated with water and wastewater treatment. The performance of CEM II/A-L cements with varying amounts of GGBS was evaluated through a series of tests conducted to determine their durability characteristics in respect of sulfate attack and sulfuric acid attack. As a benchmark, samples were also tested using CEM I cement, CEM I with GGBS, and a sulfate resistant Portland cement. Results have shown that for all cases, the addition of GGBS resulted in considerable reductions in sulfate induced expansion relative to samples using CEM I or CEM II binders alone. A slight improvement in performance relative to sulfate resisting Portland cement (SRPC) binders was also observed. However in respect of the sulfuric acid environment the regime proved too harsh and ultimately resulted in the early failure of all samples. Some difference in performance was noted, but this was not considered noteworthy. The influence of pH and acid type was studied. The conclusions were that the concretes tested cannot adequately address the durability threat to all parts of wastewater infrastructure over a significant life span due to the extraordinarily harsh nature of this form of attack.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Volume
27
Issue
1
Start Page
368
End Page
374
Copyright (Published Version)
2011 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords
  • GGBS

  • Limestone cement

  • Wastewater

  • Sulfate

  • Sulfuric acid

DOI
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.036
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
09500618
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/
Owning collection
Civil Engineering Research Collection
Scopus© citations
63
Acquisition Date
Feb 4, 2023
View Details
Views
1683
Acquisition Date
Feb 4, 2023
View Details
Downloads
1370
Last Week
2
Last Month
903
Acquisition Date
Feb 4, 2023
View Details
google-scholar
University College Dublin Research Repository UCD
The Library, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4
Phone: +353 (0)1 716 7583
Fax: +353 (0)1 283 7667
Email: mailto:research.repository@ucd.ie
Guide: http://libguides.ucd.ie/rru

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement