Options
Evaluating Ireland's IBIA as an approach to improving the quality and effectiveness of biodiversity impact assessment
Date Issued
 2013-12-15 
Date Available
 2025-07-28T13:45:10Z 
Abstract
The assessment of potential impacts of plans, programmes and projects on biodiversity is required under various legislative remits (including the European Union's Habitats, Strategic Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment Directives). The objective of such assessments is to ensure that potential negative impacts on both protected nature conservation sites and species and wider biodiversity are efficiently identified in a timely manner, quantified and subsequently avoided or mitigated, while enhancing positive effects. The procedural requirements of these legal obligations vary and, as a result, differing methodological steps, data gathering and analysis methods, and impact assessment techniques are commonly applied under each individual process, often leading to uncoordinated assessment efforts and results (in terms, for example, of scope, scale and assessment detail).In order to address these issues and improve current practice, an Integrated Biodiversity Impact Assessment (IBIA) methodology has been developed in Ireland with the overall aim of providing a holistic and systematic approach to biodiversity impact assessment. The IBIA framework seeks to ensure that relevant procedures are effectively integrated, time and resource efficiencies are optimised, and unnecessary duplication avoided. Particular emphasis is given to compliance with legal requirements, integration and communication of scientific knowledge, spatial assessment and biodiversity data considerations, and integration of biodiversity aspects with a variety of other concerns during the plan-making process. This paper presents the IBIA methodology and critically examines current key issues in biodiversity impact assessment that can be potentially addressed through IBIA, as well as remaining challenges. In addition, and in order to support the examination of the anticipated benefits of using this new methodological framework (such as biodiversity-inclusive planning through improved communication and coordinated assessment), two contrasting case studies are used, one pre-dating the development of IBIA and a second where elements of IBIA have been implemented. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Sponsorship
Environmental Protection Agency
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Volume
131
Start Page
150
End Page
160
Copyright (Published Version)
2013 Elsevier
Language
 English 
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0301-4797
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
 No Thumbnail Available 
Name
Manuscript - Integrated Biodiversity Impact Assessment - Accepted August 2013.docx
Size
81.05 KB
Format
Microsoft Word XML
Checksum (MD5) 
6cbac3ad8690e1f767ac929bd1fb5bfc
Owning collection