Options
Hot Rule of Law Potatoes: The CJEU’s Formalism in Joined Cases C‑313/23, C‑316/23, C‑332/23 and Its Implications
Author(s)
Date Issued
2025-05-26
Date Available
2025-06-30T15:02:45Z
Abstract
On 30 April 2025, the CJEU handed down its much-anticipated judgment in joined cases C‑313/23, C‑316/23, C‑332/23, which, among other pertinent questions on the GDPR, concerns the compatibility of Article 19 TEU and Article 47 of the EU Charter with a situation in which the members of a judicial inspection body have de facto remained in office indefinitely. Regrettably, however, the highly formalistic ruling will hardly make a difference in Bulgaria from where the preliminary references originated. It fails to address the underlying rule of law challenges faced by both the Judicial Inspectorate and the Supreme Judicial Council in Bulgaria at their core. As such, the judgment is a missed opportunity – an attempt to hand off a hot “rule of law” potato.
Type of Material
Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine
Publisher
Verfassungsblog
Journal
Verfassungsblog
Volume
2025
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
Hot Rule of Law Potatoes 26 May 2025.pdf
Size
199.14 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
00f50ce6a80bc42fcc368674ccea189a
Owning collection