Options
Psychosocial Interventions for Problem Alcohol Use in Primary Care Settings (PINTA): Baseline Feasibility Data
File(s)
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre_publication_PINTA_paper3_draft1.pdf | 369.35 KB |
Date Issued
18 May 2015
Date Available
18T01:00:12Z May 2016
Abstract
Objective: Many individuals receiving methadone maintenance receive their treatment through their primary care provider. As many also drink alcohol excessively, there is a need to address alcohol use to improve health outcomes for these individuals. We examined problem alcohol use and its treatment among people attending primary care for methadone maintenance treatment, using baseline data from a feasibility study of an evidence-based complex intervention to improve care. Methods: Data on addiction care processes were collected by (1) reviewing clinical records (n = 129) of people who attended 16 general practices for methadone maintenance treatment and (2) administering structured questionnaires to both patients (n = 106) and general practitioners (GPs) (n = 15). Results: Clinical records indicated that 24 patients (19%) were screened for problem alcohol use in the 12 months prior to data collection, with problem alcohol use identified in 14 (58% of those screened, 11% of the full sample). Of those who had positive screening results for problem alcohol use, five received a brief intervention by a GP and none were referred to specialist treatment. Scores on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) revealed the prevalence of hazardous, harmful, and dependent drinking to be 25% (n = 26), 6% (n = 6), and 16% (n = 17), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the proportion of patients with negative AUDITs was 0.038 (SE = 0.01). The ICCs for screening, brief intervention, and/or referral to treatment (SBIRT) were 0.16 (SE = 0.014), −0.06 (SE = 0.017), and 0.22 (SE = 0.026), respectively. Only 12 (11.3%) AUDIT questionnaires concurred with corresponding clinical records that a patient had any/no problem alcohol use. Regular use of primary care was evident, as 25% had visited their GP more than 12 times during the past 3 months. Conclusions: Comparing clinical records with patients’ experience of SBIRT can shed light on the process of care. Alcohol screening in people who attend primary care for substance use treatment is not routinely conducted. Interventions that enhance the care of problem alcohol use among this high-risk group are a priority.
Sponsorship
Health Research Board
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Taylor and Francis
Journal
Journal of Dual Diagnosis
Volume
11
Issue
2
Start Page
97
End Page
106
Copyright (Published Version)
2015 Taylor and Francis
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
Owning collection
Scopus© citations
8
Acquisition Date
Jan 30, 2023
Jan 30, 2023
Views
1792
Acquisition Date
Jan 30, 2023
Jan 30, 2023
Downloads
422
Last Month
38
38
Acquisition Date
Jan 30, 2023
Jan 30, 2023