Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
University College Dublin
    Colleges & Schools
    Statistics
    All of DSpace
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Arts and Humanities
  3. School of English, Drama & Film
  4. English, Drama & Film Research Collection
  5. Creation Myth: The Imagining of the Gothic Imagination in the Diodati Triptych: Gothic (1986), Haunted Summer (1988), and Remando al viento (1988)
 
  • Details
Options

Creation Myth: The Imagining of the Gothic Imagination in the Diodati Triptych: Gothic (1986), Haunted Summer (1988), and Remando al viento (1988)

Author(s)
O'Brien, Harvey  
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10197/27426
Date Issued
2022-08
Date Available
2025-02-11T11:51:06Z
Abstract
This article argues that amid the slasher carnage, three 1980s gothic films representing the literary imagination of Frankenstein attempted to proffer a vision of horror rooted in creation rather than death. In so doing they reinvigorate the radical roots of horror as a challenge to the status quo: a reconfiguration of life into forms which awaken fears as characters face precarious destinies haunted by their past. Ken Russell’s Gothic (1986), Ivan Passer’s Haunted Summer (1988), and Gonzalo Suárez’s Remando al viento / Rowing with the Wind (1988) all depict Mary Shelley facing personal and social challenges from her (male) peers including Percy Shelley, Lord Byron, and John Polidori. Arguably it is Mary who will in time emerge as an even more enduring literary voice, evinced by the fact of her being the protagonist of these films. During the Summer at Villa Diodati on the shores of Lake Geneva where each of these authors sought to create stories of horror, the films imagine the psychosexual power games and intellectual debates which surrounded these literary conjurations. All three films also depict an intrusion of the supernatural as Mary’s monster actually manifests in the liminal space between waking and dreaming. Though wildly different in tone and affect, all three films represent a Gothicism (or an adjacent Gothic allusion) distinct from either the nostalgic or the dismissive deployment of its tropes in other genre films at the time and in so doing raise questions about 1980s cinema and culture more broadly.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Edinburgh University Press
Journal
Gothic Studies
Volume
24
Issue
2
Start Page
118
End Page
136
Copyright (Published Version)
2022 Harvey O’Brien
Subjects

Frankenstein

Mary Shelley

Diodati

DOI
10.3366/gothic.2022.0129
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1362-7937
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name

2 EA Creation Myth with captions - FInal 11 May 2022.docx

Size

69.19 KB

Format

Unknown

Checksum (MD5)

b8ddd9096a7556dbb0466bb93b2a3aca

Owning collection
English, Drama & Film Research Collection

Item descriptive metadata is released under a CC-0 (public domain) license: https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/.
All other content is subject to copyright.

For all queries please contact research.repository@ucd.ie.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement