Options
Investment vs. Refurbishment: Examining Capacity Payment Mechanisms Using Stochastic Mixed Complementarity Problems
Author(s)
Date Issued
2017-04-01
Date Available
2019-08-27T07:18:09Z
Abstract
Capacity remuneration mechanisms exist in many electricity markets. Capacity mechanism designs do not explicitly consider the effects of refurbishment of existing generation units in order to increase their reliability. This paper presents a stochastic mixed complementarity problem to examine the impact of refurbishment on electricity prices and generation investment. Capacity payments are found to increase reliability when refurbishment is not possible, while capacity payments and reliability options yield similar results when refurbishment is possible. Final costs to consumers are similar under the two mechanisms with the exception of the initial case of overcapacity.
Sponsorship
European Commission - European Regional Development Fund
Science Foundation Ireland
Other Sponsorship
Energy Policy Research Centre (EPRC)
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE)
Journal
The Energy Journal
Volume
38
Issue
2
Start Page
27
End Page
51
Copyright (Published Version)
2017 IAEEE
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0195-6574
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
No Thumbnail Available
Name
LynchDevine.pdf
Size
741.59 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
28eb3e92c59e6ebcd8b129665e101280
Owning collection