Options
Roots, categories, and nominal concepts
Author(s)
Date Issued
2009-01
Date Available
2012-10-16T16:02:02Z
Abstract
This paper investigates what is specifically nominal in lexical semantics and how it relates to nouns as morphosyntactic objects. Nouns are argued to refer primarily to kind-level sorts, which define categories of entities in the speakers' conceptualization. This notion is characterized in semantic, ontological, and cognitive terms. Not all nominalized properties are concepts; in particular, not transparent deverbal nominalizations. Concepts thus provide a substantive notion of nominality not coextensive with the morphosyntactic one. Evidence is presented for the explanatory value of nominal concepts, as the semantic contribution of noun stems in word formation and in non-standard modification patterns like "plastic flower". Concepts also express semantic restrictions on affixation ("ornamental", but "employmental"). Finally, concepts are the value of nouns as whole complexes, not of their roots. This accords with the view that lexical categories have content, but roots are category-free.
Sponsorship
Other funder
Other Sponsorship
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Il Mulino
Journal
Lingue e linguaggio
Volume
VIII
Issue
1
Start Page
25
End Page
51
Copyright (Published Version)
2009 Società Editrice il Mulino
Subject – LCSH
Semantics
Lexical grammar
Grammar, Comparative and general--Morphology
Grammar, Comparative and general--Noun
English language--Roots
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1720-9331
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
RootsCatNomConcepts.pdf
Size
228.93 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
b041e641c1171033a61b1a28c61ac491
Owning collection
Mapped collections