Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
University College Dublin
    Colleges & Schools
    Statistics
    All of DSpace
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Health and Agricultural Sciences
  3. School of Medicine
  4. Medicine Research Collection
  5. Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE)
 
  • Details
Options

Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe: Radiography research ethics standards for Europe (RRESFE)

Author(s)
Bockhold, Sophie  
McNulty, Jonathan P.  
Abdurakman, E.  
Rainford, Louise A.  
et al.  
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10197/24288
Date Issued
2022-11
Date Available
2023-04-12T11:56:57Z
Abstract
Introduction: The Radiography Research Ethics Standards for Europe (RRESFE) project aims to provide a cross-sectional snapshot of current research ethics systems, processes, and awareness of such, across Europe together with identifying the associated challenges, education, and training needs. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey targeting radiography researchers in Europe was conducted. Data collection took place between April 26 and July 12, 2021, using a snowball sampling approach. Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to identify trends in research ethics frameworks across Europe. Results: 285 responses were received across 33 European and 23 non-European countries. Most (n = 221; 95%) European respondents stated ethics approval is required before commencing research in their country. Requirements around research ethics approval and awareness of such requirements varied by European region (X2 (2, n = 129) = 7.234, p = 0.013) and were found to differ depending on the type of research participant and study design. Additionally, European respondents reported ethics approval is a national requirement more often than their non-European counterparts (X2 (1, n = 282) = 4.316, p = 0.049). Requirements for ethics approval were also associated with the undergraduate programme duration (2-year vs. 3-year vs. 3.5 year vs. 4-year vs. multiple programme durations; X2 (4, n = 231) = 10.075, p = 0.016) and availability of postgraduate training (postgraduate training available vs. postgraduate training not available; X2 (1, n = 231) = 15.448, p = <0.001) within respondents’ country. Conclusion: Respondents from countries with longer programme durations/availability of multiple programme lengths, availability of postgraduate training, and establishment of European Qualifications Framework Level 6 were generally associated with less uncertainty and more comprehensive research ethics requirements. Implications for practice: Results are informative of the current status of research ethics within evidence-based radiography.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Radiography
Volume
28
Issue
4
Start Page
1032
End Page
1041
Copyright (Published Version)
2022 The Authors
Subjects

Research ethics

Radiography

Standards

Processes

DOI
10.1016/j.radi.2022.07.002
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1078-8174
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ie/
File(s)
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name

Bockhold et al. 2022. Research ethics systems, processes, and awareness across Europe_RRESFE.pdf

Size

654.67 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

63673e5e854cc32302312ba6f9811509

Owning collection
Medicine Research Collection

Item descriptive metadata is released under a CC-0 (public domain) license: https://creativecommons.org/public-domain/cc0/.
All other content is subject to copyright.

For all queries please contact research.repository@ucd.ie.

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement