Options
An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production
File(s)
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0306919221001494-main.pdf | 493.7 KB |
Date Issued
December 2021
Date Available
29T14:43:35Z August 2022
Abstract
Private standards in animal health and welfare (AHW) and associated quality assurance (QA) programmes are an important instrument for food policy with the potential to substantially improve AHW. However, there are concerns that they do not necessarily do so. In this study, we evaluated four private AHW standards and associated QA programmes for dairy cow production, from Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, using an existing (but adapted) conceptual framework. The framework considers criteria relating to programme goals including relevance to AHW, programme beneficiaries, effectiveness, efficiency and transparency. The current study focused on information that was publicly available online. We found limited objective information to support programme claims, although there were considerable differences between programmes. Across all programmes, problems were identified with respect to transparency, and attempts to scrutinise claims would not be a straightforward process for most consumers. Among the programmes, there were notable examples of best-practice in AHW, relating to science-based evidence, separation of risk assessment and risk management, animal-based measures, farm benchmarking, ongoing programme-level metrics and measurement, and ongoing programme review. There is a need for careful scrutiny of private standards and QA programmes, to provide consumers with assurance with respect to programme effectiveness and transparency. Further, it is important that programme efficiencies are maximised. There is a strong case for regulatory oversight of private standards in AHW and associated QA programmes. This could be within existing or defined policy instruments, both to facilitate the positive impact of these programmes and to build confidence among consumers of the validity of programme claims.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Food Policy
Volume
105
Copyright (Published Version)
2021 the Authors
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0306-9192
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
Owning collection
Scopus© citations
8
Acquisition Date
Jun 2, 2023
Jun 2, 2023
Views
201
Last Month
2
2
Acquisition Date
Jun 2, 2023
Jun 2, 2023
Downloads
24
Last Month
6
6
Acquisition Date
Jun 2, 2023
Jun 2, 2023