Options
Influence of an Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Surface Treatment on the Interfacial Fracture Toughness on Bonded Composite Joints
Author(s)
Date Issued
2007
Date Available
2013-10-03T08:58:10Z
Abstract
The aim of this work is to investigate the influence of a variety of plasma treatments on the surface properties of an epoxy-based composite material and to establish a relationship between these properties and the subsequent mechanical behaviour of adhesively bonded joints.
To this end, specimens were subjected to three different types of plasma treatment: two short treatments (2min) of Helium and Helium plus Oxygen, and one long treatment (15min) of Helium plus Oxygen. The variation in surface energy of the composite specimens was examined in each case over a period of up to 3 days using contact angle measurements. Initial results show that the surface energy was increased from an untreated value of approximately 40 mJ/m2 to a value of 65 mJ/m2 immediately after treatment. The surface energy then fell by approximately 10 mJ/m2 over the course
of three days for each treatment. The composite substrates were then bonded together using an epoxy film adhesive and the Mode I fracture toughness of the joint was determined from a series of symmetric and asymmetric double cantilever beam (DCB) tests. It was found that for both test geometries the adhesive failed cohesively. As a result, the values calculated for the mean propagation strain energy release rate, GIC, were those of the cohesive fracture toughness of the adhesive as opposed to the interfacial fracture toughness between the composite surface and adhesive.
To this end, specimens were subjected to three different types of plasma treatment: two short treatments (2min) of Helium and Helium plus Oxygen, and one long treatment (15min) of Helium plus Oxygen. The variation in surface energy of the composite specimens was examined in each case over a period of up to 3 days using contact angle measurements. Initial results show that the surface energy was increased from an untreated value of approximately 40 mJ/m2 to a value of 65 mJ/m2 immediately after treatment. The surface energy then fell by approximately 10 mJ/m2 over the course
of three days for each treatment. The composite substrates were then bonded together using an epoxy film adhesive and the Mode I fracture toughness of the joint was determined from a series of symmetric and asymmetric double cantilever beam (DCB) tests. It was found that for both test geometries the adhesive failed cohesively. As a result, the values calculated for the mean propagation strain energy release rate, GIC, were those of the cohesive fracture toughness of the adhesive as opposed to the interfacial fracture toughness between the composite surface and adhesive.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Tech Science Press
Journal
SDHM: Structural Durability & Health Monitoring
Volume
3
Issue
2
Start Page
81
End Page
86
Copyright (Published Version)
2007 Tech Science Press
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
Murphy_SDHM_Paper_2007_Final_Draft.pdf
Size
236.14 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
a70b283bed63df2f97dd7e2aeff13f9c
Owning collection