Options
Betrayal, Trust and Loyalty
Author(s)
Date Issued
2022-09-28
Date Available
2024-03-15T15:58:13Z
Abstract
I argue that while every betrayal is a breach of trust, not every breach of trust is a betrayal. I defend a conception of trust as primarily a feature of behaviour (i.e. trusting behaviour) and only secondarily a feature of a mental attitude. So it is possible to have the attitude of distrust towards someone while still trusting them in the way you behave. This makes sense of the possibility of Judas Iscariot breaching Jesus’ trust, and so betraying him, even though Jesus presumably knew that Judas would do just that. This conception of trust may be spelt out in terms of making oneself reliant on somebody in a collaboration with them. Such collaborations include relationships like friendships and love affairs, as well as political activities or defending one’s country against aggression. I argue that only when these collaborations involve a commitment to loyalty is a breach of trust a betrayal. And loyalty is a feature of those collaborations or relationships that exclude others – us/them collaborations.
Sponsorship
European Commission Horizon 2020
University College Dublin
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Journal
International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Volume
30
Issue
3
Start Page
339
End Page
356
Copyright (Published Version)
2022 The Authors
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0967-2559
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
Betrayal Trust and Loyalty.pdf
Size
699.57 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
a69c1c9179b9da757d1d9d5d7ed9e482
Owning collection