Options
Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
File(s)
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises i.pdf | 326.43 KB |
Date Issued
30 May 2012
Date Available
01T17:16:18Z December 2020
Abstract
Background: Children with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently and unpredictably present to the emergency department (ED) with pain. The painful event is the hallmark acute clinical manifestation of SCD, characterised by sudden onset and is usually bony in origin. This study aims to establish if 1.5mcg/kg of intranasal fentanyl (INF; administered via a Mucosal Atomiser Device, MAD™) is non-inferior to intravenous morphine 0.1 mg/kg in severe SCD-associated pain.Methods/design: This study is a randomised,double-blind, double-dummy active control trial of children (weighing more than 10 kg) between 1 year and 21 years of age with severe painful sickle cell crisis. Severe pain is defined as rated seven or greater on a 0 to 10 age-appropriate numeric pain scale or equivalent. The trial will be conducted in a single tertiary urban paediatric ED in Dublin, Ireland. Each patient will receive a single active agent and a single placebo via the intravenous and intranasal routes. All clinical and research staff, patients and parents will be blinded to the treatment allocation. The primary endpoint is severity of pain scored at 10 min from administration of the study medications. Secondary endpoints include pain severity measured at 0, 5, 15, 20, 30, 60 and 120 min after the administration of analgesia, proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia and incidence of adverse events. The trial ends at 120 min after the administration of the study drugs. A clinically meaningful difference in validated pain scores has been defined as 13 mm. Setting the permitted threshold to 50% of this limit (6 mm) and assuming both treatments are on average equal, a sample size of 30 patients (15 per group) will provide at least 80% power to demonstrate that INF is non-inferior to IV morphine with a level of significance of 0.05.Discussion: This clinical trial will inform of the role of INF 1.5mcg/kg via MAD in the acute treatment of severe painful sickle cell crisis in children in the ED setting.Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN67469672 and EudraCT no. 2011-005161-20. © 2012 Barrett et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Sponsorship
University College Dublin
Other Sponsorship
National Children’s Research Centre
Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital Crumlin
Clinical Research Centre, University College Dublin
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Springer
Journal
Trials
Volume
13
Copyright (Published Version)
2012 the Authors
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
1745-6215
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
Owning collection
Scopus© citations
15
Acquisition Date
Mar 30, 2023
Mar 30, 2023
Views
536
Last Month
3
3
Acquisition Date
Mar 30, 2023
Mar 30, 2023
Downloads
91
Last Month
4
4
Acquisition Date
Mar 30, 2023
Mar 30, 2023