Options
The writ of certiorari and review of summary criminal convictions, 1660-1848
File(s)
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
lqrjan2012The_writ_of_certiorari_and_review_of_summary_criminal_convictions.doc | 142.5 KB |
Author(s)
Date Issued
July 2012
Date Available
13T12:46:07Z November 2014
Abstract
Judicial review now accounts for over one third of the applications submitted to the Queen’s Bench Division. Judicial review has ascended to this point of high prominence over the course of a four hundred year history. That history is the story of the progress since the sixteenth century of the prerogative writs – particularly certiorari and mandamus. Of these prerogative writs, it is certiorari which has the closest connection with the modern process of judicial review. In the early part of its history, from the seventeenth century to the end of the eighteenth century, the writ issued against a wide range of orders made by justices of the peace and specialist agencies like commissioners of sewers. The particular focus of this study is upon its use as a means of invalidating summary convictions.
Other Sponsorship
UCD School of Law Research Committee
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Sweet and Maxwell
Journal
Law Quarterly Review
Volume
128
Issue
3
Start Page
443
End Page
465
Keywords
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0023-933X
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
Owning collection
Views
1984
Last Week
3
3
Last Month
4
4
Acquisition Date
Jun 3, 2023
Jun 3, 2023
Downloads
409
Last Week
12
12
Last Month
32
32
Acquisition Date
Jun 3, 2023
Jun 3, 2023