Options
Evaluating the Performance and Accountability of Regulators
Author(s)
Date Issued
2014
Date Available
2015-08-12T14:45:14Z
Abstract
The global financial crisis came in the wake of significant reforms to the structures, processes, powers, and rules of the regulatory regimes for financial markets in many of the countries adversely affected by the crash. The global financial crisis came in the wake of significant reforms to the structures, processes, powers, and rules of the regulatory regimes for financial markets in many of the countries adversely affected by the crash. In this Article, I follow the logic of an argument that regulation necessarily has political dimensions, even where it may appear technical. I am asking questions about how we might best think about accountability processes that encompass both democratic and technical dimensions of regulation and how their respective concerns might be combined with-in accountability regimes. Conceiving of accountability as embracing both technical and political requirements draws us towards a parallel world in which the efficiency and effectiveness of regulation is a core part of oversight concerns, alongside the issue of democratic concern with procedures.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Seattle University of Law
Journal
Seattle University Law Review
Volume
37
Issue
2
Start Page
353
End Page
374
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
File(s)
Loading...
Name
EvaluatingPerformanceAccountabilityRegulators.pdf
Size
398.13 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (MD5)
efd77e0781f64e1ab384b4b4bd5503f4
Owning collection