A Phenomenological Grounding of Feminist Ethics
Files in This Item:
|JBSPh - Phenomenological Grounding for Feminist Ethics.pdf||Accepted version||288.52 kB||Adobe PDF||Download Request a copy|
|Title:||A Phenomenological Grounding of Feminist Ethics||Authors:||Daly, Anya||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10021||Date:||27-Jun-2018||Online since:||2019-04-18T07:09:23Z||Abstract:||The central hypothesis of this paper is that the phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty offers significant philosophical groundwork for an ethics that honours key feminist commitments – embodiment, situatedness, diversity and the intrinsic sociality of subjectivity. Part 1 evaluates feminist criticisms of Merleau-Ponty. Part 2 defends the claim that Merleau-Ponty’s non-dualist ontology underwrites leading approaches in feminist ethics, notably Care Ethics and the Ethics of Vulnerability. Part 3 examines Merleau-Ponty’s analyses of embodied percipience, arguing that these offer a powerful critique of the view from nowhere, a totalizing God’s-eye-view with pretensions to objectivity. By revealing the normative structure of perceptual gestalts in the intersubjective domain, he establishes the view from everywhere. Normativity is no longer deferred to higher authorities such as duty, utility or the valorised virtue, but through the perceptual gestalt it is returned to the perceiving embodied subject. This subject, defined by inherent intersubjectivity, is thereby vulnerable to others and has the capacity for care.||Funding Details:||Irish Research Council||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor & Francis||Journal:||Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology||Volume:||50||Issue:||1||Start page:||1||End page:||18||Copyright (published version):||2018 The British Society for Phenomenology||Keywords:||Phenomenology; Feminist ethics; Ontology; Merleau-Ponty; Intersubjectivity; Perception; Normativity; Care Ethics; The Ethics of Vulnerability||DOI:||10.1080/00071773.2018.1487195||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.