Marked Variability in the Extent of Protein Disorder within and between Viral Families
Files in This Item:
|Marked variability in the extent of protein disorder within and between viral families.pdf||547.21 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Marked Variability in the Extent of Protein Disorder within and between Viral Families||Authors:||Pushker, Ravindra
Davey, Norman E.
Shields, Denis C.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10072||Date:||19-Apr-2013||Online since:||2019-04-23T10:37:50Z||Abstract:||Intrinsically disordered regions in eukaryotic proteomes contain key signaling and regulatory modules and mediate interactions with many proteins. Many viral proteomes encode disordered proteins and modulate host factors through the use of short linear motifs (SLiMs) embedded within disordered regions. However, the degree of viral protein disorder across different viruses is not well understood, so we set out to establish the constraints acting on viruses, in terms of their use of disordered protein regions. We surveyed predicted disorder across 2,278 available viral genomes in 41 families, and correlated the extent of disorder with genome size and other factors. Protein disorder varies strikingly between viral families (from 2.9% to 23.1% of residues), and also within families. However, this substantial variation did not follow the established trend among their hosts, with increasing disorder seen across eubacterial, archaebacterial, protists, and multicellular eukaryotes. For example, among large mammalian viruses, poxviruses and herpesviruses showed markedly differing disorder (5.6% and 17.9%, respectively). Viral families with smaller genome sizes have more disorder within each of five main viral types (ssDNA, dsDNA, ssRNA+, dsRNA, retroviruses), except for negative single-stranded RNA viruses, where disorder increased with genome size. However, surveying over all viruses, which compares tiny and enormous viruses over a much bigger range of genome sizes, there is no strong association of genome size with protein disorder. We conclude that there is extensive variation in the disorder content of viral proteomes. While a proportion of this may relate to base composition, to extent of gene overlap, and to genome size within viral types, there remain important additional family and virus-specific effects. Differing disorder strategies are likely to impact on how different viruses modulate host factors, and on how rapidly viruses can evolve novel instances of SLiMs subverting host functions, such as innate and acquired immunity.||Funding Details:||Science Foundation Ireland||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||PLoS||Journal:||PLoS ONE||Volume:||8||Issue:||4||Start page:||e60724||Copyright (published version):||2013 the Authors||Keywords:||Eukaryotic proteomes; Disordered proteins; Short linear motifs (SLiMs); Viral protein disorder; Viruses; Genome size; Viral proteomes; Immunity||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0060724||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Conway Institute Research Collection|
Conway Institute Research Collection
Computer Science Research Collection
Medicine Research Collection
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.