Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry?
Files in This Item:
|Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry?.pdf||2.28 MB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Can biosecurity and local network properties predict pathogen species richness in the salmonid industry?||Authors:||Yatabe, Tadaishi; More, Simon John; Geoghegan, Fiona; et al.||Editors:||Young, Kyle A.||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10109||Date:||30-Jan-2018||Online since:||2019-04-24T09:15:55Z||Abstract:||Salmonid farming in Ireland is mostly organic, which implies limited disease treatment options. This highlights the importance of biosecurity for preventing the introduction and spread of infectious agents. Similarly, the effect of local network properties on infection spread processes has rarely been evaluated. In this paper, we characterized the biosecurity of salmonid farms in Ireland using a survey, and then developed a score for benchmarking the disease risk of salmonid farms. The usefulness and validity of this score, together with farm indegree (dichotomized as 1 or > 1), were assessed through generalized Poisson regression models, in which the modeled outcome was pathogen richness, defined here as the number of different diseases affecting a farm during a year. Seawater salmon (SW salmon) farms had the highest biosecurity scores with a median (interquartile range) of 82.3 (5.4), followed by freshwater salmon (FW salmon) with 75.2 (8.2), and freshwater trout (FW trout) farms with 74.8 (4.5). For FW salmon and trout farms, the top ranked model (in terms of leave-one-out information criteria, looic) was the null model (looic = 46.1). For SW salmon farms, the best ranking model was the full model with both predictors and their interaction (looic = 33.3). Farms with a higher biosecurity score were associated with lower pathogen richness, and farms with indegree > 1 (i.e. more than one fish supplier) were associated with increased pathogen richness. The effect of the interaction between these variables was also important, showing an antagonistic effect. This would indicate that biosecurity effectiveness is achieved through a broader perspective on the subject, which includes a minimization in the number of suppliers and hence in the possibilities for infection to enter a farm. The work presented here could be used to elaborate indicators of a farm’s disease risk based on its biosecurity score and indegree, to inform risk-based disease surveillance and control strategies for private and public stakeholders.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||PLoS||Journal:||PLoS ONE||Volume:||13||Issue:||1||Start page:||e0191680||Copyright (published version):||2018 the Authors||Keywords:||Salmonid farming; Ireland; Fresh water; Sea water; Fish farming; Pathogens; Trout; Epidemiology; Salmon; Infectious diseases control||DOI:||10.1371/journal.pone.0191680||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Veterinary Medicine Research Collection|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 50254
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.