Ethical Considerations and Change Recipients’ Reactions: ‘It’s Not All About Me’

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJacobs, Gabriele-
dc.contributor.authorKeegan, Anne E.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-30T11:52:55Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-30T11:52:55Z-
dc.date.copyright2016 the Authorsen_US
dc.date.issued2016-09-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Business Ethicsen_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-4544-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/10226-
dc.description.abstractAn implicit assumption in most works on change recipient reactions is that employees are self-centred and driven by a utilitarian perspective. According to large parts of the organizational change literature, employees’ reactions to organizational change are mainly driven by observations around the question ‘what will happen to me?’ We analysed change recipients’ reactions to 26 large-scale planned change projects in a policing context on the basis of 23 in-depth interviews. Our data show that change recipients drew on observations with three foci (me, colleagues and organization) to assess change, making sense of change as multidimensional and mostly ambivalent in nature. In their assessment of organizational change, recipients care not only about their own personal outcomes, but go beyond self-interested concerns to show a genuine interest in the impact of change on their colleagues and organization. Meaningful engagement of employees in organizational change processes requires recognizing that reactions are not simply ‘all about me’. We add to the organizational change literature by introducing a behavioural ethics perspective on change recipients’ reactions highlighting an ethical orientation where moral motives that trigger change reactions get more attention than is common in the change management literature. Beyond the specifics of our study, we argue that the genuine concern of change recipients for the wellbeing of others, and the impact of the organizations’ activities on internal and external stakeholders, needs to be considered more systematically in research on organizational change.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3311-7.en_US
dc.subjectBehavioural ethicsen_US
dc.subjectChange managementen_US
dc.subjectChange recipientsen_US
dc.subjectChange resistanceen_US
dc.subjectDeontic justiceen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational changeen_US
dc.subjectPolicingen_US
dc.titleEthical Considerations and Change Recipients’ Reactions: ‘It’s Not All About Me’en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.internal.authorcontactotheranne.keegan@ucd.ieen_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.volume152en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage73en_US
dc.identifier.endpage90en_US
dc.check.date2019-09-30-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10551-016-3311-7-
dc.neeo.contributorJacobs|Gabriele|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorKeegan|Anne E.|aut|-
dc.date.updated2018-10-04T12:38:12Z-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Business Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JBE_PostPeerReview.pdf280.22 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Jun 26, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.