What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents
Files in This Item:
|Clark et al.(2019).pdf||649.91 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents||Authors:||Clark, Leigh
Cowan, Benjamin R.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10307||Date:||9-May-2019||Online since:||2019-05-07T10:37:05Z||Abstract:||Conversational agents promise conversational interaction but fail to deliver. Efforts often emulate functional rules from human speech, without considering key characteristics that conversation must encapsulate. Given its potential in supporting long-term human-agent relationships, it is paramount that HCI focuses efforts on delivering this promise. We aim to understand what people value in conversation and how this should manifest in agents. Findings from a series of semi-structured interviews show people make a clear dichotomy between social and functional roles of conversation, emphasising the long-term dynamics of bond and trust along with the importance of context and relationship stage in the types of conversations they have. People fundamentally questioned the need for bond and common ground in agent communication, shifting to more utilitarian definitions of conversational qualities. Drawing on these findings we discuss key challenges for conversational agent design, most notably the need to redefine the design parameters for conversational agent interaction.||Funding Details:||Irish Research Council||Type of material:||Conference Publication||Publisher:||ACM||Copyright (published version):||2019 the Authors||Keywords:||Conversational agents; Speech HCI; Spoken dialogue systems; Voice user interface design; Interviews||DOI:||10.1145/3290605.3300705
|Other versions:||http://chi2019.acm.org/||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Conference Details:||The 2019 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2019) Glasgow, United Kingdom, 4-9 May 2019||ISBN:||978-1-4503-5970-2/19/05|
|Appears in Collections:||Information and Communication Studies Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.