Standardizing interestingness measures for association rules
|Title:||Standardizing interestingness measures for association rules||Authors:||Shaikh, Mateen; McNicholas, Paul D.; Antonie, M. Luiza; Murphy, Thomas Brendan||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10544||Date:||11-Sep-2018||Online since:||2019-05-20T13:13:25Z||Abstract:||Interestingness measures provide information about association rules. The value of an interestingness measure is often interpreted relative to the overall range of the interestingness measure. However, properties of individual association rules can further restrict what value an interestingness measure can achieve. These additional constraints are not typically taken into account in analysis, potentially misleading the investigator. Considering the value of an interestingness measure relative to this further constrained range provides greater insight than the original range alone and can even alter researchers' impressions of the data. Standardizing interestingness measures takes these additional restrictions into account, resulting in values that provide a relative measure of the attainable values. We explore the impacts of standardizing interestingness measures on real and simulated data.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Wiley||Journal:||Statistical Analysis and Data Mining||Volume:||11||Issue:||6||Start page:||282||End page:||295||Copyright (published version):||2018 Wiley||Keywords:||Association rules; Frequency patterns; Interestingness measures; Standardizations; Text categorization||DOI:||10.1002/sam.11394||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Insight Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.