Happy birthday? An observational study

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Gabrielle E.-
dc.contributor.authorKelleher, Cecily-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T08:02:23Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-21T08:02:23Z-
dc.date.copyright2018 the Authorsen_US
dc.date.issued2018-09-27-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Epidemiology & Community Healthen_US
dc.identifier.issn0143-005X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/10557-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Previous studies show contradictory findings on the relationship between birthday and deathday, in particular whether people postpone death until after their birthday. We examine the phenomenon in eight groups of famous people. Methods: Birthday and deathday for the following groups were recorded: British prime ministers, US presidents, Academy Award best actor, best female actor, best director, Nobel Prize winners, Wimbledon men’s and ladies' singles winners, all from when records began. For each group, the difference in days between the deathday and birthday was calculated. Under the hypothesis of no association, one can expect the difference to have a uniform distribution. This is assessed using goodness-of-fit tests on a circle. Results: All groups showed some departure from the uniform and it occurred around the birthday in all groups. British prime ministers, US presidents, Academy Award actors and directors, Nobel Prize winners and Wimbledon men show a ’dip' in deaths around the birthday. The length of the ’dip' varied between the groups and so they gave different p-values on different test statistics. For Academy Award female actors and Wimbledon ladies, there was rise in deaths before and after birthday. When Nobel Prize winners were subdivided into their categories, Science and Literature had a ’dip' around the birthday, but not other categories. Conclusions: We conclude ’something' happens to deathday around the birthday. Some groups of famous people show a ’dip' in death rate around the birthday while for others, particularly women, the association is in the opposite direction.en_US
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBMJen_US
dc.subjectBiostatisticsen_US
dc.subjectDirectional statisticsen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectPsychological stressen_US
dc.subjectPsychosocial factorsen_US
dc.subjectDeath rateen_US
dc.titleHappy birthday? An observational studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.internal.authorcontactothergabrielle.kelly@ucd.ieen_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.volume72en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1168en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1172en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/jech-2018-210632-
dc.neeo.contributorKelly|Gabrielle E.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorKelleher|Cecily|aut|-
dc.date.updated2018-10-12T11:57:32Z-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/en
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Mathematics and Statistics Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Happy_birthday_November_Repository.pdf383.17 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

523
Last Week
3
Last month
17
checked on Feb 26, 2021

Download(s)

204
checked on Feb 26, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.