A comparison of small strain stiffness in till as measured by seismic refraction and barometric loading response
|Title:||A comparison of small strain stiffness in till as measured by seismic refraction and barometric loading response||Authors:||Kelly (Harley), R.M.G.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10560||Date:||12-Jun-2018||Online since:||2019-05-21T08:29:02Z||Abstract:||Soil stiffness can vary over several orders of magnitude depending on the actual range of strain imposed by testing, or as a result of operational strains in geotechnical structures. Soil stiffness changes rapidly with strain level at low strain levels (0.01–0.1%) and the variation with strain is not linear. Characterization of the in situ small strain stiffness of stiff soils is important in geotechnical design; however, analyses of the mechanical behaviour of these soils is confounded by stiffness values that vary with strain level. Stiff till cuttings are susceptible to progressive failure as a result of strain softening. As a consequence, the evolution of stiffness during progressive failure is both a key parameter in characterizing pre-failure slope deformations and a key diagnostic of softening. Changes in strength (due to softening) should be reflected in commensurate temporal and spatial changes in stiffness; consequently, real-time, in situ measurements of stiffness would better define the progression of softening. Seismic surveys, which create small compression and shear strains, have been used to estimate in situ small strain elastic moduli. These spatially extensive measurements can be correlated to temporal variations in stiffness from the monitoring of barometric loading efficiency. In this latter method, the pore pressure response of a grouted (sealed) piezometer to barometric pressure fluctuations is used to measure the compressibility (stiffness) of the formation. This article summarizes the results of field trials within a cutting in stiff till in Northern Ireland in which these two techniques were used to characterize small strain stiffness.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Geological Society of London||Journal:||Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology||Volume:||51||Issue:||4||Start page:||493||End page:||502||Copyright (published version):||2018 the Authors||Keywords:||Geotechnical engineering; Barometric loading efficiency; Geophysics; Surface wave survey; Small strain stiffness; Lodgement till||DOI:||10.1144/qjegh2017-040||Other versions:||http://qjegh.lyellcollection.org/content/51/4/493||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Civil Engineering Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.