The Role of Surprise in Learning: Different Surprising Outcomes Affect Memorability Differentially

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
The role of surprise in learning.pdf216.02 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: The Role of Surprise in Learning: Different Surprising Outcomes Affect Memorability Differentially
Authors: Foster, Meadhbh I.Keane, Mark T.
Permanent link:
Date: 29-Oct-2018
Online since: 2019-05-21T10:09:15Z
Abstract: Surprise has been explored as a cognitive‐emotional phenomenon that impacts many aspects of mental life from creativity to learning to decision‐making. In this paper, we specifically address the role of surprise in learning and memory. Although surprise has been cast as a basic emotion since Darwin's (1872) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, recently more emphasis has been placed on its cognitive aspects. One such view casts surprise as a process of “sense making” or “explanation finding”: metacognitive explanation‐based theory proposes that people's perception of surprise is a metacognitive assessment of the cognitive work done to explain a surprising outcome. Or, to put it more simply, surprise increases with the explanatory work required to resolve it. This theory predicts that some surprises should be more surprising than others because they are harder to explain. In the current paper, this theory is extended to consider the role of surprise in learning as evidenced by memorability. This theory is tested to determine how scenarios with differentially surprising outcomes impact the memorability of those outcomes. The results show that surprising outcomes (less‐known outcomes) that are more difficult to explain are recalled more accurately than less‐surprising outcomes that require little (known outcomes) or no explanation (normal).
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Wiley Online Library
Journal: Topics of Cognitive Science
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Start page: 75
End page: 87
Copyright (published version): 2018 Cognitive Science Society
Keywords: SurpriseLearningExplanationRecall
DOI: 10.1111/tops.12392
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Insight Research Collection

Show full item record

Citations 50

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jul 2, 2020

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jul 5, 2020


checked on Jul 5, 2020

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.