Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities

Files in This Item:
Access to this item has been restricted by the copyright holder until:2021-04-16
File Description SizeFormat 
EvaluationInertia_Final.pdf277.52 kBAdobe PDFDownload    Request a copy
Title: Evaluation complacency or evaluation inertia? A study of evaluative metrics and research practices in Irish universities
Authors: Ma, Lai
Ladisch, Michael
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10583
Date: 16-Apr-2019
Online since: 2019-05-21T13:17:52Z
Abstract: Evaluative metrics have been used for research assessment in most universities and funding agencies with the assumption that more publications and higher citation counts imply increased productivity and better quality of research. This study investigates the understanding and perceptions of metrics, as well as the influences and implications of the use of evaluative metrics on research practices, including choice of research topics and publication channels, citation behavior, and scholarly communication in Irish universities. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with researchers from the humanities, the social sciences, and the sciences in various career stages. Our findings show that there are conflicting attitudes toward evaluative metrics in principle and in practice. The phenomenon is explained by two concepts: evaluation complacency and evaluation inertia. We conclude that evaluative metrics should not be standardized and institutionalized without a thorough examination of their validity and reliability and without having their influences on academic life, research practices, and knowledge production investigated. We also suggest that an open and public discourse should be supported for the discussion of evaluative metrics in the academic community.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
Journal: Research Evaluation
Copyright (published version): 2019 the Authors
Keywords: Evaluative metricsResearch assessmentResearch practicesCitation behaviourEvaluation complacencyEvaluation inertia
DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvz008
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Information and Communication Studies Research Collection

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM



This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.