An Interfering Judge, a Biddable Executive, and an Unbroken Neck

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Irish Jurist paper (2018).docx41.29 kBUnknownDownload
Title: An Interfering Judge, a Biddable Executive, and an Unbroken Neck
Authors: O'Donnell, Ian
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10657
Date: Dec-2018
Online since: 2019-05-27T08:46:34Z
Abstract: Cahir Davitt had an aversion to capital punishment. This first came to light during the civil war when, as Judge-Advocate General of the National Army, he used a variety of stratagems to frustrate the execution of death sentences. He was appointed a judge of the High Court in 1945 and presided over five murder trials where a guilty verdict was returned and he was required to impose the mandatory sentence of death by hanging. In one of these cases (and in another where he was not the sentencing judge) he attended a Government meeting and argued, successfully, that the law should be deflected from its course. These interventions were kept secret at the time. They raise questions about the separation of powers in the context of executive clemency.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Irish Jurist
Journal: The Irish Jurist
Volume: 60
Start page: 112
End page: 122
Keywords: Cahir DavittCapital punishmentMurderClemencySeparation of powers
Other versions: http://www.irishjurist.com/index.htm
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Law Research Collection

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.