An Interfering Judge, a Biddable Executive, and an Unbroken Neck
Files in This Item:
|Irish Jurist paper (2018).docx||41.29 kB||Unknown||Download|
|Title:||An Interfering Judge, a Biddable Executive, and an Unbroken Neck||Authors:||O'Donnell, Ian||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10657||Date:||Dec-2018||Online since:||2019-05-27T08:46:34Z||Abstract:||Cahir Davitt had an aversion to capital punishment. This first came to light during the civil war when, as Judge-Advocate General of the National Army, he used a variety of stratagems to frustrate the execution of death sentences. He was appointed a judge of the High Court in 1945 and presided over five murder trials where a guilty verdict was returned and he was required to impose the mandatory sentence of death by hanging. In one of these cases (and in another where he was not the sentencing judge) he attended a Government meeting and argued, successfully, that the law should be deflected from its course. These interventions were kept secret at the time. They raise questions about the separation of powers in the context of executive clemency.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Irish Jurist||Journal:||The Irish Jurist||Volume:||60||Start page:||112||End page:||122||Keywords:||Cahir Davitt; Capital punishment; Murder; Clemency; Separation of powers||Other versions:||http://www.irishjurist.com/index.htm||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Law Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.