Economic Voting in EU Referendums: Sociotropic versus Egocentric Voting in the Lisbon Treaty Plebiscites in Ireland
Files in This Item:
|2019 ElkinkQuinlanSinnott on two Lisbon referendums.pdf||186.19 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Economic Voting in EU Referendums: Sociotropic versus Egocentric Voting in the Lisbon Treaty Plebiscites in Ireland||Authors:||Elkink, Johan A.; Quinlan, Stephen; Sinnott, Richard||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/10919||Date:||27-Jun-2019||Online since:||2019-07-18T10:04:38Z||Abstract:||Economic voting is one of the most studied aspects of electoral behaviour. The dominant view is that sociotropic economic considerations are more important to voters in national elections. However, other research suggests that utilitarian motivations are key to understanding support for the EU. An EU integration referendum offers the opportunity to explore whether and when sociotropic or utilitarian motivations are more important in determining vote choice. The unusual combination of two successive referendums in Ireland on the Lisbon Treaty, either side of the global financial crisis, provides the ideal opportunity to test these assumptions. Using data from two post-referendum surveys, we demonstrate that the economy mattered in both referendums but that different economic motivations drove vote choice in each, with sociotropic motivations more critical as a result of the global financial crisis. Our study has implications for economic voting and referendums and demonstrates that context is crucial in determining a voter’s economic motivations in a plebiscite.||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Cogitatio||Journal:||Politics and Governance||Volume:||7||Issue:||2||Start page:||334||End page:||350||Copyright (published version):||2019 the Authors||Keywords:||Economic voting; Egocentric voting; Financial crisis; Ireland; Lisbon Treaty; Referendum; Sociotropic voting||DOI:||10.17645/pag.v7i2.1944||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Politics and International Relations Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.