Young People Seeking Help Online for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPretorius, Claudette-
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Derek-
dc.contributor.authorCowan, Benjamin R.-
dc.contributor.authorCoyle, David-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-11T08:43:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-11T08:43:54Z-
dc.date.copyright2019 the Authorsen_US
dc.date.issued2019-08-26-
dc.identifier.citationJMIR Mental Healthen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/11074-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Young people are particularly vulnerable to experiencing mental health difficulties, but very few seek treatment or help during this time. Online help-seeking may offer an additional domain where young people can seek aid for mental health difficulties, yet our current understanding of how young people seek help online is limited. Objective: This was an exploratory study which aimed to investigate the online help-seeking behaviors and preferences of young people. Methods: This study made use of an anonymous online survey. Young people aged 18-25, living in Ireland, were recruited through social media ads on Twitter and Facebook and participated in the survey. Results: A total of 1308 respondents completed the survey. Many of the respondents (80.66%; 1055/1308) indicated that they would use their mobile phone to look online for help for a personal or emotional concern. When looking for help online, 82.57% (1080/1308) of participants made use of an Internet search, while 57.03% (746/1308) made use of a health website. When asked about their satisfaction with these resources, 36.94% (399/1080) indicated that they were satisfied or very satisfied with an Internet search while 49.33% (368/746) indicated that they were satisfied or very satisfied with a health website. When asked about credibility, health websites were found to be the most trustworthy, with 39.45% (516/1308) indicating that they found them to be trustworthy or very trustworthy. Most of the respondents (82.95%; 1085/1308) indicated that a health service logo was an important indicator of credibility, as was an endorsement by schools and colleges (54.97%; 719/1308). Important facilitators of online help-seeking included the anonymity and confidentiality offered by the Internet, with 80% (1046/1308) of the sample indicating that it influenced their decision a lot or quite a lot. A noted barrier was being uncertain whether information on an online resource was reliable, with 55.96% (732/1308) of the respondents indicating that this influenced their decision a lot or quite a lot. Conclusions: Findings from this survey suggest that young people are engaging with web-based mental health resources to assist them with their mental health concerns. However, levels of satisfaction with the available resources vary. Young people are engaging in strategies to assign credibility to web-based resources, however, uncertainty around their reliability is a significant barrier to online help-seeking.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commission Horizon 2020en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScience Foundation Irelanden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJMIRen_US
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.en_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjecteHealthen_US
dc.subjectmHealthen_US
dc.subjectInterneten_US
dc.subjectHelp-seeking behavioren_US
dc.subjectHealth literacyen_US
dc.subjectYoung adultsen_US
dc.subjectSurveyen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.titleYoung People Seeking Help Online for Mental Health: Cross-Sectional Survey Studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.check.date2020-03-01-
dc.identifier.doi10.2196/13524-
dc.neeo.contributorPretorius|Claudette|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorChambers|Derek|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorCowan|Benjamin R.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorCoyle|David|aut|-
dc.description.othersponsorshipInsight Research Centreen_US
dc.description.adminUpdate citation details during checkdate report - ACen_US
dc.date.updated2019-08-29T14:24:20Z-
dc.identifier.grantid722561-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Computer Science Research Collection
Information and Communication Studies Research Collection
Insight Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
insight_publication.pdf97.49 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.