Diffusion and Fluid-Interaction in Itrongay Pegmatite (Madagascar): The Results of in situ Ar-Ar Dating of Gem-Quality Alkali Feldspar and U-Pb Dating of Apatite Inclusions within it
Files in This Item:
|2019002901-20190327174309.pdf||164.06 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Diffusion and Fluid-Interaction in Itrongay Pegmatite (Madagascar): The Results of in situ Ar-Ar Dating of Gem-Quality Alkali Feldspar and U-Pb Dating of Apatite Inclusions within it||Authors:||Popov, Daniil V.; Spikings, R. A.; Scaillet, R.; Daly, J. Stephen; et al.||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11107||Date:||19-Aug-2019||Online since:||2019-10-03T15:24:02Z||Abstract:||Constraining how the temperature of rocks changes with time is an important aspect of many geological studies. Geoscientists commonly address this problem by interpreting step-heating Ar-Ar data obtained from feldspars [e.g. 1 and therein] and increasingly more often by interpreting U-Pb data obtained from apatite [e.g. 2 and therein]. Reconstruction of thermal histories using these approaches is underpinned by the assumption that the redistribution of radiogenic Ar in feldspars and Pb in apatite over geological timescales is controlled by volume diffusion. However, is this assumption always valid? Here we revisit the mechanisms of Ar redistribution in famous gem-quality alkali feldpsar from Itrongay pegmatite by combining in situ Ar-Ar dating with cathodoluminescence imaging. Previous in situ Ar-Ar studies of Itrongay feldspar suggested that it has partially lost radiogenic Ar by diffusion [3, 4], supporting the underlying assumption of feldspar ArAr thermochronology. However, our results indicate that this feldspar records a protracted history of interaction with fluids between ~475 Ma (dates in the core) and ~180 Ma (dates at the rim), casting doubt on previous interpretations. Alongside, we have obtained in situ U-Pb dates of three apparently protogenetic apatite inclusions within the studied feldspar crystal. These yield older dates than feldpsar (~490- 535 Ma), and in contrast to feldspar seem to have been partially reset by diffusion, possibly prior to their entrapment.  Harrison and Lovera (2013) GSL Spec. Pub., 378, 91- 106;  Paul et al. (2018) GCA, 288, 275-300  Flude et al. (2014) Geol. Soc. London Spec. Pub., 378, 265–275;  Arnaud and Kelley (1997) GCA, 61, 3227–3255.||Funding Details:||Science Foundation Ireland||Type of material:||Conference Publication||Keywords:||Argon redistribution; Radioisotope dating||Other versions:||https://goldschmidt.info/2019/
|Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Conference Details:||Goldschmidt 2019, Barcelona, Spain, 18-23 August 2019|
|Appears in Collections:||Earth Sciences Research Collection|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.