Does EU rural expenditure correspond to regional development needs?

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUthes, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Fen-
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Edel-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T09:13:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-08T09:13:31Z-
dc.date.copyright2016 Elsevieren_US
dc.date.issued2017-01-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policyen_US
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/11118-
dc.description.abstractThe EU offers a complex system of rural development interventions as part of its Common Agricultural Policy. A Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (CMEF) has been developed for the programming period 2007–2013 in response to challenges faced with the evaluation of rural development measures in earlier programming periods. Statistical and multivariate analysis of CMEF baseline (regional characteristics) and input (expenditure) indicator data at the NUTS2 subdivision level is used to compare four typical expenditure allocation patterns (Competitiveness, Environment, Rural Viability, Equal Spending) in terms of associated regional characteristics and development trends. The results suggest expenditure priorities are generally in line with regional needs and that there are some positive development trends, for example higher increase of agricultural labour productivity in the Competitiveness Group, while for environmental topics the level of data required remains unsatisfactory for trend assessment. 17% of the regions have a budget allocation pattern deviating from other regions with similar characteristics, which could indicate ineffective priority setting. Consistent CMEF data over multiple programming periods would be desirable to support the relationships found and to facilitate time series analysis, but this seems questionable given that the European Commission has discontinued the CMEF in 2014 with further adaptations for the 2014–2020 programming period underway.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsThis is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Land Use Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Land Use Policy (60, (2017) 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.016.en_US
dc.subjectTargetingen_US
dc.subjectRural developmenten_US
dc.subjectLand use changeen_US
dc.titleDoes EU rural expenditure correspond to regional development needs?en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.internal.authorcontactotheredel.kelly@ucd.ieen_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.startpage267en_US
dc.identifier.endpage280en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.016-
dc.neeo.contributorUthes|Sandra|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorLi|Fen|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorKelly|Edel|aut|-
dc.description.adminpublisher: Elsevier articletitle: Does EU rural expenditure correspond to regional development needs? journaltitle: Land Use Policy articlelink: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.016 content_type: article copyright: © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.date.updated2019-05-11T12:28:29Z-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Agriculture and Food Science Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Does Rural Expenditure Correspond to Regional Development Needs.pdf389.58 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

6
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Dec 8, 2019

Page view(s)

160
Last Week
12
Last month
checked on Dec 8, 2019

Download(s)

37
checked on Dec 8, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.