Economic History: ‘An Isthmus Joining Two Great Continents’?
|Title:||Economic History: ‘An Isthmus Joining Two Great Continents’?||Authors:||Ó Gráda, Cormac||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11270||Date:||Jan-2020||Online since:||2020-02-11T12:15:54Z||Abstract:||This paper offers (yet another) reflection on the history and current status of economic history. No other sub-discipline of economics or history has tried so hard to be loved as economic history. That love is unrequited, because economic history’s problem is existential: it is an inherently interdisciplinary field. Economists and historians are interested in only small parts of what economic history should embrace. Some examples are given of how narrow views of the past the impoverish research. Not all is gloom and doom, however. The controversies economic history provokes and the insights it provides touch on issues that resonate and that will continue to do so.||Type of material:||Working Paper||Publisher:||University College Dublin. School of Economics||Start page:||1||End page:||52||Series/Report no.:||UCD Centre for Economic Research Working Paper Series; WP2020/01||Copyright (published version):||2020 the Author||Keywords:||Economic history; Cliometrics||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Not peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Economics Working Papers & Policy Papers|
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.