Treatment of stimulant use disorder: A systematic review of reviews
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment of stimulant use disorder A systematic review of reviews.pdf | 914.06 kB | Adobe PDF | Download |
Title: | Treatment of stimulant use disorder: A systematic review of reviews | Authors: | Ronsley, Claire; Nolan, Seonaid; Knight, Rod; Klimas, Jan; et al. | Permanent link: | http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11719 | Date: | 18-Jun-2020 | Online since: | 2020-11-24T11:59:40Z | Abstract: | AIMS:Stimulant use disorder contributes to a substantial worldwide burden of disease, although evidence-based treatment options are limited. This systematic review of reviews aims to: (i) synthesize the available evidence on both psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for the treatment of stimulant use disorder; (ii) identify the most effective therapies to guide clinical practice, and (iii) highlight gaps for future study. METHODS:A systematic database search was conducted to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Eligible studies were those that followed standard systematic review methodology and assessed randomized controlled trials focused on the efficacy of interventions for stimulant use disorder. Articles were critically appraised using an assessment tool adapted from Palmeteer et al. and categorized for quality as 'core' or 'supplementary' reviews. Evidence from the included reviews were further synthesized according to pharmacological or non-pharmacological management themes. RESULTS:Of 476 identified records, 29 systematic reviews examining eleven intervention modalities were included. The interventions identified include: contingency management, cognitive behavioural therapy, acupuncture, antidepressants, dopamine agonists, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, disulfiram, opioid agonists, N-Acetylcysteine, and psychostimulants. There was sufficient evidence to support the efficacy of contingency management programs for treatment of stimulant use disorder. Psychostimulants, n-acetylcysteine, opioid agonist therapy, disulfiram and antidepressant pharmacological interventions were found to have insufficient evidence to support or discount their use. Results of this review do not support the use of all other treatment options. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this review supports the use of contingency management interventions for the treatment of stimulant use disorder. Although evidence to date is insufficient to support the clinical use of psychostimulants, our results demonstrate potential for future research in this area. Given the urgent need for effective pharmacological treatments for stimulant use disorder, high-quality primary research focused on the role of psychostimulant medications for the treatment of stimulant use disorder is needed. | Funding Details: | European Commission Horizon 2020 | Funding Details: | MSFHR/St. Paul’s Foundation Scholar Award Canada Research Chair in Addiction Medicine CIHR New Investigator Award Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research St. Paul’s Hospital Foundation University of British Columbia Canadian Institutes of Health Research |
Type of material: | Journal Article | Publisher: | Public Library of Science (PLoS) | Journal: | PLoS ONE | Volume: | 15 | Issue: | 6 | Copyright (published version): | 2020 the Authors | Keywords: | Cocaine; Systematic reviews; Psychostimulants; Metaanalysis; Amphetamines; Psychotherapy; Antidepressants | DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0234809 | Language: | en | Status of Item: | Peer reviewed | ISSN: | 1932-6203 | This item is made available under a Creative Commons License: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/ |
Appears in Collections: | Medicine Research Collection |
Show full item record
Page view(s)
171
Last Week
6
6
Last month
69
69
checked on Jan 27, 2021
Download(s)
57
checked on Jan 27, 2021
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.