“What Bothers Me Most Is the Disparity between the Choices that People Have or Don’t Have”: A Qualitative Study on the Health Systems Responsiveness to Implementing the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act in Ireland
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ijerph-17-03294(1).pdf | 652.45 kB | Adobe PDF | Download |
Title: | “What Bothers Me Most Is the Disparity between the Choices that People Have or Don’t Have”: A Qualitative Study on the Health Systems Responsiveness to Implementing the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act in Ireland | Authors: | Ní Shé, Éidín; O'Donnell, Deirdre; Donnelly, Sarah; Davies, Carmel; Fattori, Francesco; Kroll, Thilo | Permanent link: | http://hdl.handle.net/10197/11953 | Date: | 9-May-2020 | Online since: | 2021-02-16T16:31:07Z | Abstract: | Objective: The Assisted Decision-Making (ADM) (Capacity) Act was enacted in 2015 inIreland and will be commenced in 2021. This paper is focused on this pre-implementation stage withinthe acute setting and uses a health systems responsiveness framework. Methods: We conductedface-to-face interviews using a critical incident technique. We interviewed older people includingthose with a diagnosis of dementia (n=8), family carers (n=5) and health and social care professionals(HSCPs) working in the acute setting (n=26). Results: The interviewees reflected upon a healthcaresystem that is currently under significant pressures. HSCPs are doing their best, but they are oftenhalted from delivering on the will and preference of their patients. Many older people and familycarers feel that they must be very assertive to have their preferences considered. All expressedconcern about the strain on the healthcare system. There are significant environmental barriers thatare hindering ADM practice. Conclusions: The commencement of ADM provides an opportunityto redefine the provision, practices, and priorities of healthcare in Ireland to enable improvedpatient-centred care. To facilitate implementation of ADM, it is therefore critical to identify andprovide adequate resources and work towards solutions to ensure a seamless commencement ofthe legislation.> | Funding Details: | Health Research Board | Type of material: | Journal Article | Publisher: | MDPI | Journal: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | Volume: | 17 | Issue: | 9 | Start page: | 3294 | End page: | 3294 | Copyright (published version): | 2020 the Authors | Keywords: | Assisted decision making; Supported decision making; Health system responsiveness; Qualitative; Person centred-care; Public and patient involvement | DOI: | 10.3390/ijerph17093294 | Language: | en | Status of Item: | Peer reviewed | ISSN: | 1660-4601 | This item is made available under a Creative Commons License: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ie/ |
Appears in Collections: | Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems Research Collection Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice Research Collection |
Show full item record
Page view(s)
105
checked on Feb 25, 2021
Download(s)
6
checked on Feb 25, 2021
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.