Spatial and network characteristics of Irish cattle movements

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTratalos, Jamie A.-
dc.contributor.authorMadden, Jamie M.-
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Guy-
dc.contributor.authorGraham, David A.-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Áine B.-
dc.contributor.authorMore, Simon John-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T11:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-23T11:58:07Z-
dc.date.copyright2020 the Authorsen_US
dc.date.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.citationPreventive Veterinary Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/12292-
dc.description.abstractOur aim was to examine, for the first time, the spatial and network characteristics of cattle movements between herds in the Republic of Ireland (ROI), to inform policy and research of relevance to the surveillance and management of disease in Irish cattle. We analysed movements in 2016 as discrete herd to herd pairings (degree), herd to herd pairings by date of move (contacts) and herd to herd pairings by date and individual animal (transfers), and looked at each of these as movements out of a herd (out degree, out contacts, out transfers) and into a herd (in degree, in contacts, in transfers). We found that the frequency distributions, by herd, of these six move types were all heavily right skewed but in the case of the ‘out’ data types more closely followed a log-normal than the scale free distribution often reported for livestock movement data. For each distinct herd to herd contact in a given direction, over 90 % occurred only once, whereas the maximum number of occurrences was 62. Herd-level Spearman rank correlations between inward moves (represented as in degree, in contacts, in transfers) and outward moves (out degree, out contacts, out transfers) were weak or even negative whereas correlations between different measures of outward moves or inward moves (e.g. out degree vs. out contacts, in transfers vs. in degree) were stronger. Correlations between these variables and the network measure betweenness varied between r = 0.513 and r = 0.587. Some herds took part in a relatively large number of movements whilst also retaining their cattle for long periods (> 100 days) between moves. In and out degree, contacts and transfers were mapped across Ireland on a 5 km grid, and additionally normalized per 1000 animals and per herd. We found considerable variation in the number of movements by county. Approximately half of transfers were conducted within a single county, but the number and distance of between county movements varied considerably by county of origin and county of destination, with the proportion of moves completed within a single county correlated with its size. Herds exchanging cattle via a market were generally further apart than when moves were made directly herd to herd. For contacts, the distances moved away from the herd were on average greater for origin herds in the west of ROI whereas distances moved to a herd were generally greater for destination herds in the centre-east and the north-west.Our aim was to examine, for the first time, the spatial and network characteristics of cattle movements between herds in the Republic of Ireland (ROI), to inform policy and research of relevance to the surveillance and management of disease in Irish cattle. We analysed movements in 2016 as discrete herd to herd pairings (degree), herd to herd pairings by date of move (contacts) and herd to herd pairings by date and individual animal (transfers), and looked at each of these as movements out of a herd (out degree, out contacts, out transfers) and into a herd (in degree, in contacts, in transfers). We found that the frequency distributions, by herd, of these six move types were all heavily right skewed but in the case of the ‘out’ data types more closely followed a log-normal than the scale free distribution often reported for livestock movement data. For each distinct herd to herd contact in a given direction, over 90 % occurred only once, whereas the maximum number of occurrences was 62. Herd-level Spearman rank correlations between inward moves (represented as in degree, in contacts, in transfers) and outward moves (out degree, out contacts, out transfers) were weak or even negative whereas correlations between different measures of outward moves or inward moves (e.g. out degree vs. out contacts, in transfers vs. in degree) were stronger. Correlations between these variables and the network measure betweenness varied between r = 0.513 and r = 0.587. Some herds took part in a relatively large number of movements whilst also retaining their cattle for long periods (> 100 days) between moves. In and out degree, contacts and transfers were mapped across Ireland on a 5 km grid, and additionally normalized per 1000 animals and per herd. We found considerable variation in the number of movements by county. Approximately half of transfers were conducted within a single county, but the number and distance of between county movements varied considerably by county of origin and county of destination, with the proportion of moves completed within a single county correlated with its size. Herds exchanging cattle via a market were generally further apart than when moves were made directly herd to herd. For contacts, the distances moved away from the herd were on average greater for origin herds in the west of ROI whereas distances moved to a herd were generally greater for destination herds in the centre-east and the north-west.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Agriculture, Food and the Marineen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCattle movementen_US
dc.subjectIrelanden_US
dc.subjectNetworken_US
dc.subjectPower lawen_US
dc.subjectSpatialen_US
dc.titleSpatial and network characteristics of Irish cattle movementsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.internal.authorcontactothersimon.more@ucd.ieen_US
dc.statusPeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.volume183en_US
dc.citation.otherArticle Number: 105095en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105095-
dc.neeo.contributorTratalos|Jamie A.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorMadden|Jamie M.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorMcGrath|Guy|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorGraham|David A.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorCollins|Áine B.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorMore|Simon John|aut|-
dc.date.updated2020-09-03T09:25:45Z-
dc.rights.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:Veterinary Medicine Research Collection
CVERA Research Collection
Files in This Item:
 File SizeFormat
Download1-s2.0-S0167587720301148-main-2.pdf30.75 MBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

155
Last Week
7
Last month
15
checked on Sep 24, 2021

Download(s)

23
checked on Sep 24, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email research.repository@ucd.ie and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.