Concepts of Objects as Involving Laws: A Kantian and Pragmatist Line of Thought
Files in This Item:
|Download||O'Shea, J (2016) 'Concepts of Objects as Prescribing Laws - A Kantian and Pragmatist Line of Thought'.pdf||270.5 kB||Adobe PDF|
|Title:||Concepts of Objects as Involving Laws: A Kantian and Pragmatist Line of Thought||Authors:||O'Shea, James||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12431||Date:||28-Nov-2017||Online since:||2021-08-20T10:07:50Z||Abstract:||This paper traces a Kantian and pragmatist line of thinking that connects the ideas of conceptual content, object cognition, and modal constraints in the form of counterfactual sustaining causal laws. It is an idea that extends from Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason through C. I. Lewis’s Mind and the World-Order to the Kantian naturalism of Wilfrid Sellars and the analytic pragmatism of Robert Brandom. Kant put forward what I characterize as a modal conception of objectivity, which he developed as an extended argument stretching from the transcendental deduction through the analogies of experience to the regulative maxims of reason and reflective judgment. In related ways in Lewis and Sellars, the very idea of an object of knowledge (and of intentionality more generally) is connected with a certain lawfulness or modal constraint the necessary representation of which, they argue, is an achievement of conceptualization. While Sellars agreed with the spirit of Lewis’s famous pragmatic conception of the a priori, Sellars’s conception of meaning and conceptual content differed in crucial ways with important consequences for this issue. I argue furthermore that a certain phenomenalist temptation threatens to spoil this insight both among some of Kant’s interpreters and in Lewis’s thought. Finally, I point out that Brandom’s "Kant-Sellars thesis" provides new support for this line of thought. Although questions concerning idealism continue to raise controversies for neo-Kantians and pragmatists, the line of thought itself represents a distinctive and still promising approach to questions concerning intentionality and conceptual content.||Type of material:||Book Chapter||Publisher:||Routledge||Copyright (published version):||2016 Taylor & Francis||Keywords:||Brandom; Kant; Hume; Lewis; Sellars; Modality; Conceptual content||Other versions:||https://www.routledge.com/Pragmatism-Kant-and-Transcendental-Philosophy/Gava-Stern/p/book/9780815371953||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Is part of:||Stern R., Gava G. (eds.). Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy||ISBN:||9781138791916||This item is made available under a Creative Commons License:||https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/|
|Appears in Collections:||Philosophy Research Collection|
Show full item record
If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email firstname.lastname@example.org and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.