Aid curse with Chinese characteristics? Chinese development flows and economic reforms
Files in This Item:
|Download||WPS52 Aid Curse with Chinese Characteristics_SB_NOTES.pdf||1.43 MB||Adobe PDF|
|Title:||Aid curse with Chinese characteristics? Chinese development flows and economic reforms||Authors:||Brazys, Samuel; Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya||Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/12500||Date:||25-May-2018||Online since:||2021-09-24T14:35:00Z||Abstract:||The emergence of China as a major development partner requires a reassessment of traditional donorrecipient dynamics. In addition to using new rhetoric like ”South-South cooperation” or ”Win-Win”, China has also eschewed classifications and practices of the traditional donors of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (OECD) Donor Assistance Committee (DAC). Yet this ”new approach” and willful ignorance may not spare China from the same issues confronted by traditional donors. In this paper, we consider the extent to which Chinese development efforts disincentivize difficult economic reforms by providing recipient governments with a budgetry cushion. Using an instrumental variable approach with panel data covering 117 countries during the 2000-2014 period, we find that the presence of Chinese development flows, particularly those over which recipients have a high degree of discretion, inhibit broader economic reform. These findings are robust to a number of alternative specifications, data, instruments and approaches and are suggestive of an institutional aid curse ”with Chinese characteristics” as insidious as that which has plagued some traditional donor-recipient relationships.||Funding Details:||European Commission Horizon 2020||Type of material:||Working Paper||Publisher:||AIDDATA||Keywords:||Development aid; Economic reforms; Endogeneity; China||Other versions:||https://www.aiddata.org/publications/aid-curse-with-chinese-characteristics-chinese-development-flows-and-economic-reforms||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Not peer reviewed||This item is made available under a Creative Commons License:||https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ie/|
|Appears in Collections:||Politics and International Relations Research Collection|
Show full item record
If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email firstname.lastname@example.org and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.