Repository logo
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
University College Dublin
  • Colleges & Schools
  • Statistics
  • All of DSpace
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. College of Health and Agricultural Sciences
  3. School of Veterinary Medicine
  4. Veterinary Medicine Research Collection
  5. An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production
 
  • Details
Options

An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production

File(s)
FileDescriptionSizeFormat
Download 1-s2.0-S0306919221001494-main.pdf493.7 KB
Author(s)
More, Simon John 
Marchewka, J. 
Hanlon, Alison 
Balzani, Agnese 
Boyle, Laura 
Uri
http://hdl.handle.net/10197/13102
Date Issued
December 2021
Date Available
29T14:43:35Z August 2022
Abstract
Private standards in animal health and welfare (AHW) and associated quality assurance (QA) programmes are an important instrument for food policy with the potential to substantially improve AHW. However, there are concerns that they do not necessarily do so. In this study, we evaluated four private AHW standards and associated QA programmes for dairy cow production, from Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, using an existing (but adapted) conceptual framework. The framework considers criteria relating to programme goals including relevance to AHW, programme beneficiaries, effectiveness, efficiency and transparency. The current study focused on information that was publicly available online. We found limited objective information to support programme claims, although there were considerable differences between programmes. Across all programmes, problems were identified with respect to transparency, and attempts to scrutinise claims would not be a straightforward process for most consumers. Among the programmes, there were notable examples of best-practice in AHW, relating to science-based evidence, separation of risk assessment and risk management, animal-based measures, farm benchmarking, ongoing programme-level metrics and measurement, and ongoing programme review. There is a need for careful scrutiny of private standards and QA programmes, to provide consumers with assurance with respect to programme effectiveness and transparency. Further, it is important that programme efficiencies are maximised. There is a strong case for regulatory oversight of private standards in AHW and associated QA programmes. This could be within existing or defined policy instruments, both to facilitate the positive impact of these programmes and to build confidence among consumers of the validity of programme claims.
Type of Material
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Food Policy
Volume
105
Copyright (Published Version)
2021 the Authors
Keywords
  • Quality assurance pro...

  • Private standards

  • Animal health and wel...

  • Dairy production

  • Food labelling transp...

DOI
10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102169
Language
English
Status of Item
Peer reviewed
ISSN
0306-9192
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ie/
Owning collection
Veterinary Medicine Research Collection
Scopus© citations
4
Acquisition Date
Feb 3, 2023
View Details
Views
195
Acquisition Date
Feb 4, 2023
View Details
Downloads
14
Acquisition Date
Feb 4, 2023
View Details
google-scholar
University College Dublin Research Repository UCD
The Library, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4
Phone: +353 (0)1 716 7583
Fax: +353 (0)1 283 7667
Email: mailto:research.repository@ucd.ie
Guide: http://libguides.ucd.ie/rru

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement