An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production

Files in This Item:
 File SizeFormat
Download1-s2.0-S0306919221001494-main.pdf493.7 kBAdobe PDF
Title: An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production
Authors: More, Simon JohnMarchewka, J.Hanlon, AlisonBalzani, AgneseBoyle, Laura
Permanent link:
Date: Dec-2021
Online since: 2022-08-29T14:43:35Z
Abstract: Private standards in animal health and welfare (AHW) and associated quality assurance (QA) programmes are an important instrument for food policy with the potential to substantially improve AHW. However, there are concerns that they do not necessarily do so. In this study, we evaluated four private AHW standards and associated QA programmes for dairy cow production, from Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, using an existing (but adapted) conceptual framework. The framework considers criteria relating to programme goals including relevance to AHW, programme beneficiaries, effectiveness, efficiency and transparency. The current study focused on information that was publicly available online. We found limited objective information to support programme claims, although there were considerable differences between programmes. Across all programmes, problems were identified with respect to transparency, and attempts to scrutinise claims would not be a straightforward process for most consumers. Among the programmes, there were notable examples of best-practice in AHW, relating to science-based evidence, separation of risk assessment and risk management, animal-based measures, farm benchmarking, ongoing programme-level metrics and measurement, and ongoing programme review. There is a need for careful scrutiny of private standards and QA programmes, to provide consumers with assurance with respect to programme effectiveness and transparency. Further, it is important that programme efficiencies are maximised. There is a strong case for regulatory oversight of private standards in AHW and associated QA programmes. This could be within existing or defined policy instruments, both to facilitate the positive impact of these programmes and to build confidence among consumers of the validity of programme claims.
Type of material: Journal Article
Publisher: Elsevier
Journal: Food Policy
Volume: 105
Copyright (published version): 2021 the Authors
Keywords: Quality assurance programmePrivate standardsAnimal health and welfareDairy productionFood labelling transparency
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102169
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
ISSN: 0306-9192
This item is made available under a Creative Commons License:
Appears in Collections:Veterinary Medicine Research Collection
CVERA Research Collection

Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Oct 5, 2022


checked on Oct 5, 2022

Google ScholarTM



If you are a publisher or author and have copyright concerns for any item, please email and the item will be withdrawn immediately. The author or person responsible for depositing the article will be contacted within one business day.