Ethnic conflict and the two-state solution : the Irish experience of partition

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
42_coakley.pdf181.77 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Ethnic conflict and the two-state solution : the Irish experience of partition
Authors: Coakley, John
Permanent link:
Date: 2004
Abstract: Although the partition of Ireland in 1921 was only one of several in which this strategy was adopted as Britain withdrew politically from territories formerly under its rule, it was marked by a number of distinctive features. This paper examines and seeks to interpret some of these features. It begins by looking at the roots of partition in the history of Ireland’s long political relationship with Great Britain, and explores the emergence of partition as a major question in the early twentieth century. Following a general assessment of the impact of partition on the two parts of Ireland, it turns to the manner in which partition survived as a political issue up to 1998. Some brief remarks comparing the Irish with the Palestinian experience are made in conclusion.
Funding Details: Not applicable
Type of material: Working Paper
Publisher: University College Dublin. Institute for British-Irish Studies
Series/Report no.: IBIS Working Papers; 42; MFPP Ancillary Papers; 3
Copyright (published version): The author, 2004
Keywords: Ethnic conflictPartitionIrelandPalestine1921Great Britain
Subject LCSH: Ethnic conflict--Ireland
Ireland--History--Partition, 1921
Ireland--Relations--Great Britain
Great Britain--Relations--Ireland
Other versions:
Language: en
Status of Item: Peer reviewed
Conference Details: Revised version of a paper presented at the seminar of the Palestinian Academic Association for the Study of International Affairs, Ramallah, 10-14 October 2004.
Appears in Collections:Institute for British-Irish Studies (IBIS) Working Papers and Policy Papers
Politics and International Relations Research Collection

Show full item record

Page view(s) 20

checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 20

checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.