Territory and politics in Ireland and Great Britain after devolution ; Implications of devolutions for England
|Title:||Territory and politics in Ireland and Great Britain after devolution ; Implications of devolutions for England||Authors:||Aughey, Arthur
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2212||Date:||2002||Abstract:||Territory and politics in Ireland and Great Britain after devolution-
This paper focuses primarily on the experience of devolution in the United Kingdom. Reflecting on a number of theories that have been posited as explanations of the current realty of British territorial politics, the author draws on Schopenhauer’s fable of the porcupines in order to reconcile the twin characteristics of renovation and revolution. The paper points to the political need to achieve a sense of cohesion, in order to secure the existence of a British identity in the face of challenges such as nationalism and the European Union. The paper concludes with the paradox of the Northern Irish situation in the broader context of British-Irish relations.
Implications of devolutions for England- This paper outlines devolutionary moves within England and Cornwall, and the implications of the government white paper. The eight regional development agencies with their associated regional chambers are briefly described, as is the weak challenge so far posed by elected mayors. The presentation suggests that such a quasi-federal England could fit well into a broadened British-Irish Council.
|Funding Details:||Not applicable||Type of material:||Working Paper||Publisher:||University College Dublin. Institute for British-Irish Studies||Copyright (published version):||The authors, 2002||Keywords:||Devolution;Territorial politics;United Kingdom||Subject LCSH:||Decentralization in government--Great Britain
Great Britain--Politics and government
|Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed||Conference Details:||Papers presented to the IBIS conference “Renovation or Revolution? New territorial politics in Ireland and the United Kingdom”, University College, Dublin, 3 April 2002.|
|Appears in Collections:||Institute for British-Irish Studies (IBIS) Working Papers and Policy Papers|
Show full item record
Page view(s) 20138
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.