Bridge assessment loading : a comparison of West and Central/East Europe
Files in This Item:
|J28_OBrien_et_al_-_2nd_Rev edit.pdf||132.57 kB||Adobe PDF||Download|
|Title:||Bridge assessment loading : a comparison of West and Central/East Europe||Authors:||O'Brien, Eugene J.
Caprani, Colin C.
O'Connell, Gavin J.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2269||Date:||Mar-2006||Online since:||2010-07-29T15:38:31Z||Abstract:||An objective of the European Commission 5th Framework Research project, Samaris, is to determine the bridge repair needs of new and possible future member states of the European Union (EU). This paper reports the findings of a study into the differences in bridge traffic loading between such countries and long-standing EU member states. A comparison is made of bridge traffic loading for two-lane short- to medium-length bridges in two countries deemed to be representative: Slovenia and the Netherlands. Truck classification and weight data from weigh-in-motion sites in each country are used in conjunction with other European data in a wide range of simulations to assess the implications of the differences for bridge assessments. Significant differences are identified between countries, both in the truck volumes and in the statistical distributions of truck weight. The implications for a range of bridge load effects are calculated and compared to the characteristic load effects implied by the Eurocode. Country- or network-specific bridge assessment load models are recommended to reflect the significant differences in traffic between European regions.||Funding Details:||European Research Council||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||Taylor & Francis||Journal:||Bridge Structures||Volume:||2||Issue:||1||Start page:||25||End page:||33||Copyright (published version):||2010 Taylor & Francis||Keywords:||Bridge assessment; East; New member state; Traffic loading; WIM; Weigh-in-motion||Subject LCSH:||Bridges--Live loads--European Union Countries
Motor vehicle scales
Structural analysis (Engineering)
|DOI:||10.1080/15732480600578451||Other versions:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15732480600578451||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Critical Infrastructure Group Research Collection|
Civil Engineering Research Collection
Show full item record
Page view(s) 20158
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.