Reliability of crack detection for baseline condition assessments
|Title:||Reliability of crack detection for baseline condition assessments||Authors:||Laefer, Debra F.
|Permanent link:||http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2331||Date:||Jun-2010||Abstract:||Despite billions of dollars of annual exposure from claims and litigation related to construction-induced damage, there are no quantitatively based, agreed upon standards or procedures as to what constitutes due diligence with respect to a pre-construction, condition assessment. Similarly, the relative accuracy, reliability, and costs for various inspection approaches are not well established. This paper compares the relative performance capabilities of crack detection by sidewalk-based, manual inspection with digital photography, terrestrial Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), and elevated manual inspections based on 2 brick and 2 concrete buildings (8.2-14.3m high) in Dublin Ireland. Results showed that non-manual methods tended to over-predict crack widths by at least 5 mm and underestimate crack lengths by one-half. Digital photography, however, detected the shortest cracks (as short as 17 mm) and had no significant decline in accuracy beyond 12m high, which he added benefit of generating a permanent, objective record. Terrestrial LiDAR proved neither particularly accurate nor cost-effective. Finally, operator-based, reliability problems emerged with all methods, with discrepancies of at least 11%. Overall, digital photography taken and archived, but not analyzed, was the most cost-effective, accurate, and reliable approach.||Funding Details:||Science Foundation Ireland||Type of material:||Journal Article||Publisher:||American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE)||Copyright (published version):||2010 ASCE||Keywords:||Bricks; Cracking; Defects; Digital techniques; Field investigations; Masonry; Non-destructive tests; Imaging techniques; Site evaluation||Subject LCSH:||Building inspection--Standards
|DOI:||10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2010)16:2(129)||Language:||en||Status of Item:||Peer reviewed|
|Appears in Collections:||Urban Institute Ireland Research Collection|
Critical Infrastructure Group Research Collection
Civil Engineering Research Collection
Show full item record
This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.