Affluence versus Equality? A critique of Wilkinson and Pickett’s book ‘The Spirit Level’

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Connell, Michael F.
dc.description.abstractThe Spirit Level made strong claims that in developed countries, income growth was no longer important and the focus should turn to income differentials within society. Putting affluence before parity and solidarity led to the rise of widespread anxiety, insecurity and social dysfunction. In this paper, six problems are identified with the argument made in the Spirit Level: 1. There is no conflict between wealth and equality. In fact they tend to be highly correlated (i.e. wealthy societies are far more egalitarian than poorer societies); 2. Correlational data are relied upon to imply causal direction; 3. The focus on income inequality ignores the role of savings and state services; 4. There is no evidence that people are systematically stigmatised by buying ‘second-class’ goods; 5. Investment in ‘luxuries’ in wealthy countries have unforeseen consequences in raising living standards in poorer countries, e.g. the mobile phone; 6. The status of women is far more highly associated with a country’s wealth than its level of inequality.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNot applicableen
dc.format.extent109669 bytes
dc.subjectEconomic growthen
dc.subject.lcshEquality--Economic aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshWealth--Moral and ethical aspectsen
dc.subject.lcshEconomic developmenten
dc.subject.lcshConsumption (Economics)en
dc.titleAffluence versus Equality? A critique of Wilkinson and Pickett’s book ‘The Spirit Level’en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.internal.availabilityFull text availableen
dc.statusNot peer revieweden
dc.neeo.contributorO'Connell|Michael F.|aut|-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Psychology Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
spirit level summary critique.pdf473.5 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 5

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jan 28, 2020

Download(s) 5

checked on Jan 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.