Experimental tests of survey responses to expenditure questions

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
gearywp200925.pdf217.83 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Title: Experimental tests of survey responses to expenditure questions
Authors: Comerford, David
Delaney, Liam
Harmon, Colm
Permanent link: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/2679
Date: Jul-2009
Online since: 2011-01-05T16:40:27Z
Abstract: This paper tests for a number of survey effects in the elicitation of expenditure items. In particular we examine the extent to which individuals use features of the expenditure question to construct their answers. We test whether respondents interpret question wording as researchers intend and examine the extent to which prompts, clarifications and seemingly arbitrary features of survey design influence expenditure reports. We find that over one quarter of respondents have difficulty distinguishing between “you” and “your household” when making expenditure reports; that respondents report higher pro-rata expenditure when asked to give responses on a weekly as opposed to monthly or annual time scale; that respondents give higher estimates when using a scale with a higher mid-point; and that respondents give higher aggregated expenditure when categories are presented in a disaggregated form. In summary, expenditure reports are constructed using convenient rules of thumb and available information, which will depend on the characteristics of the respondent, the expenditure domain and features of the survey question. It is crucial to further account for these features in ongoing surveys.
Funding Details: Not applicable
Type of material: Working Paper
Publisher: University College Dublin. Geary Institute
Series/Report no.: UCD Geary Institute Discussion Paper Series; WP 09 25
Subject LCSH: Consumption (Economics)--Surveys--Methodology
Household surveys--Methodology
Other versions: http://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/200925.html
Language: en
Status of Item: Not peer reviewed
Appears in Collections:Geary Institute Working Papers

Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 20

checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.