Housing risk and return : evidence from a housing asset-pricing model

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCase, Karl E.-
dc.contributor.authorCotter, John-
dc.contributor.authorGabriel, Stuart A.-
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-06T14:39:54Z-
dc.date.available2011-01-06T14:39:54Z-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10197/2684-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates the risk-return relationship in determination of housing asset pricing. In so doing, the paper evaluates behavioral hypotheses advanced by Case and Shiller (1988, 2002, 2009) in studies of boom and post-boom housing markets. The paper specifies and tests a housing asset pricing model (H-CAPM), whereby expected returns of metropolitan-specific housing markets are equated to the market return, as represented by aggregate US house price time-series. We augment the model by examining the impact of additional risk factors including aggregate stock market returns, idiosyncratic risk, momentum, and Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) size effects. Further, we test the robustness of H-CAPM results to inclusion of controls for socioeconomic variables commonly represented in the house price literature, including changes in employment, affordability, and foreclosure incidence. Consistent with the traditional CAPM, we find a sizable and statistically significant influence of the market factor on MSA house price returns. Moreover we show that market betas have varied substantially over time. Also, we find the basic housing CAPM results are robust to the inclusion of other explanatory variables, including standard measures of risk and other housing market fundamentals. Additional tests of the validity of the model using the Fama-MacBeth framework offer further strong support of a positive risk and return relationship in housing. Our findings are supportive of the application of a housing investment risk-return framework in explanation of variation in metro-area cross-section and time-series US house price returns. Further, results strongly corroborate Case-Shiller behavioral research indicating the importance of speculative forces in the determination of U.S. housing returns.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNot applicableen
dc.format.extent406442 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity College Dublin. Geary Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUCD Geary Institute Discussion Paper Seriesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP 10 05en
dc.relation.requiresEconomists Online Collectionen
dc.subjectAsset pricingen
dc.subjectHouse price returnsen
dc.subjectRisk factorsen
dc.subject.classificationG10en
dc.subject.classificationG11en
dc.subject.classificationG12en
dc.subject.lcshAssets (Accounting)en
dc.subject.lcshHousing--Prices--United Statesen
dc.subject.lcshReal estate investment--Rate of returnen
dc.titleHousing risk and return : evidence from a housing asset-pricing modelen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.internal.availabilityFull text availableen
dc.internal.webversionshttp://ideas.repec.org/p/ucd/wpaper/201005.html-
dc.statusNot peer revieweden
dc.neeo.contributorCase|Karl E.|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorCotter|John|aut|-
dc.neeo.contributorGabriel|Stuart A.|aut|-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Geary Institute Working Papers
FMC² Research Collection
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
gearywp201005.pdf396.92 kBAdobe PDFDownload
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 20

137
checked on May 25, 2018

Download(s) 20

520
checked on May 25, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check


This item is available under the Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Ireland. No item may be reproduced for commercial purposes. For other possible restrictions on use please refer to the publisher's URL where this is made available, or to notes contained in the item itself. Other terms may apply.